Strife767

Doesn't look like he actually did anything other than training, though. The quoted link above contains further links embedded in this chunk, so you can go to the URL for more information.

According to this, Weehawken's taxes are higher.

Hint: All caps makes you come off like a raving lunatic. Is that what you want? So now, since you feel that way, have you tried contacting Santos and telling him this directly? Or do you feel it's a better idea to just complain about it to yourself, and that doing that will help more? How is it possible for one person to butcher the word "families" in so many ways?

Allow me to show you that closing a quote tag prevents you from looking like an idiot when you're trying to quote someone. a "]" was all you needed. Viola: What's this a courtroom. Its Apples and Oranges and has nothing to do with the issue. 76481[/snapback] You know, you're not very good at understanding analogies.

Good point.

I suppose it's impossible to know if food tastes like crap unless one is a master chef? Your implication is laughable. It takes no courage to shoot and kill unarmed civilians. In fact, it takes quite a bit of cowardice. Okay, you tell me why it takes courage to shoot at and kill unarmed civilians, since you obviously disagree with what I said. You can use the following space: I'm waiting.

Sadly, "at this point," many of those people you just described in that second sentence are already dead.

Bet you anything one could make a similar complaint about practically any other time. When do you think would be the best time to have it?

What a ridiculous generalization. Talk about sweeping--not even now, but there never was, according to you. Get real.

Which of course explains why I'm still being replied to. Idiot.

writes a post you don't have any answer to. Typical cowardly evasion. http://forums.kearnyontheweb.com/index.php...dpost&pid=76250

You replied directly to my post, idiot.

Ironically, it's actually short for "ah (probably) God," though its current use is that of a generic exclamation. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search...searchmode=none Of course, someone as proudly ignorant as you wouldn't know that, would you 2dim?

http://forums.kearnyontheweb.com/index.php...indpost&p=76271

Your point would be more valid if Bush hasn't been lying his ass off constantly, making signing up sound like a better idea than it actually was/is. In an environment where the justifications for military action are completely honest, your argument makes perfect sense, however.

http://forums.kearnyontheweb.com/index.php...indpost&p=76093 Too bad you don't have the guts to actually answer anything I say.

Killing civilians doesn't make one courageous, scum.

This post is hilariously ironic. All of the above mistakes are clearly simple typos (in all three cases, the extra/wrong letter is adjacent to the correct one on the keyboard), not to mention that someone who doesn't know that there's not supposed to be a space between the end of the sentence and its punctuation shouldn't be criticizing anyone else's grammar. From the day I learned how to write, I never, ever made that mistake. So what's your excuse, "teacher"? IF indeed you are a teacher, then all the more reason you shouldn't be making such elementary mistakes in your own writing. Two question marks? That extra space? If that's what you teach your students in English, you ought to be let go for incompetence.

The Constitution was not written on the battlefield. Fighting to establish our independence was but the FIRST step, not the only one. In the same way, we're DONE with the military part of this 'plan' (as ill-conceived as it is to begin with). Even if we had enough troops to quell ALL sectarian violence in Iraq, guess what? Democracy will not magically establish itself following that. The Iraqis have to come together (NOT on a battlefield) and cooperate in a way completely unrelated to military prowess or conflict for that to happen. And they're clearly not cooperating. What's the point? It's their country, not ours. If THEY will not do their part, no amount of action on ours is going to have any ultimate or lasting effect.

(having read what comes next) I don't think you know what a scrollbar is. I keep up with the forum and I don't reply to every single post made on KOTW--it comes out to less than six posts a day on average. Big deal; also, it only takes me a couple of minutes to write the average post. So what does that come out to, half hour of posting a day, if that? OH NOES! I bet Bryan spends more time writing one post than I do writing all the posts I do on a given day.

Excuse me? Solution: Bring the troops home. Our occupation of Iraq has not done anything but make terrorism worse and more widespread. Iraq never attacked us. We deposed Saddam Hussein, a known ENEMY OF AL QAEDA, WHICH IS THE GROUP THAT ACTUALLY ATTACKED US. And to add insult to injury, we have stopped hunting the man who orchestrated the 9/11 attacks! The cherry on top is that we have lost most, if not all, of the respect of pretty much all of our allies. It's time to cut our losses. The Iraq invasion was clearly a blunder, and asking our MILITARY to establish a democracy in a country too wrapped up in its own sectarian violence to be concerned with any kind of real lasting peace is absurd! That is not our troops' job! If the Iraqis are unwilling or unable to come together as a whole, then we're stymied. Can't you people understand that? Forget the partisan bullshit. This is about removing our precious troops (don't forget that there are PEOPLE behind those guns of ours) from harm's way when there is no good reason for them to be there.

You mean like Osama Bin Laden? Oh wait, your idea of terminating terrorists is to completely ignore those that actually attack us, apparently. Moron.

Yes, idiot. Establishing a democracy is not a military operation.

Liar. Here's what the Senate Intelligence Committee had to say on the matter in September of 2006: Well?

Do you get it that there is more terrorism in Iraq now than there was before we showed up, "numbnuts?" You're out of your mind.