Strife767

What? Do you even know what a straw man argument is? I suggest you learn the meanings of terms before you use them. P.S. Case in point: Paul has been accused of being a liar on this forum countless times, but every time Paul or someone else asks them to back the claim up, they shut up right away.

Not if you don't celebrate Christmas, obviously. Why do you want to exclude people celebrating other holidays from the well-wishing? What's your problem?

Thanks, and you too!

Basic knowledge of history, something you obviously do not have (even if you omit the words "of history). Considering the kinds of things you reject despite mountains of evidence (like the Theory of Evolution), I have a feeling it wouldn't be worth my time to show you another example.

I want to hear THOSE recordings now, because that's really what eliminated the reasonable "some kid is exaggerating" possibility with the Paszkiewicz thing (considering that in both cases, it's only one student complaining).

Hahaha, yeah, all "three" of them.

http://www.onelook.com/?w=misleader I don't know what English you speak, but there it is, goofball.

Google archives greater amounts of data daily. It's not like it's a physical impossibility. But what would probably be more likely is using automated speech recognition software to pick up certain 'suspect words' or phrases and then focus on those lines, not archiving anything else. The bad thing is that no one knows (that's talking) what's being done or not done. And when it comes to something like this, that is a Very Bad Thing. This administration hasn't exactly created a reputation of trustworthiness is all I'm saying.

Considering what a ridiculous statement this is, I'd hold back on using the word "brilliant" sarcastically.

It sets a bad precedent. Freedom isn't usually blasted away in one shot, but eroded little by little over time. If the government wants to listen in on someone's phone calls, let them get a damned warrant first. Whatever happened to probable cause?

I gotta say, the latest numbers say the exact opposite.

What exactly is it about having the rank of Lieutenant that saves so much money?

There would not even be a possibility for a "gotcha moment" if Paszkiewicz wasn't a liar, and that's a fact.

It's easy to accuse, but it never seems to get past that stage, strangely enough...

Guess it was God who wrote your reply to it, then?

He's not the one who keeps bringing it up. Was it Paul who mentioned Matthew for no apparent reason in the senior play thread? No, I don't think so. Get your facts straight. At least Paul had the decency to, instead of responding where it would continue to be off-topic, to 'reply' in a topic where it would be on the original subject. It is Matthew's detractors that just can't stop whining about him, even this long after the fact; get it right.

I have just finished watching this documentary... ...I don't know what to say. I have never seen something so chilling in my entire life. Even now my fingers tremble as I type, and tears are still flowing... I cannot put into words what a shock to the system it was. When this whole Iraq thing started, I was mostly apathetic toward it. It sounded fishy, but I never could have imagined that it was this bad from the beginning... I can't type anymore for a while...

Oh, shut up. Anytime I see your stupid name attached to a post in which something substantial was written, I can already tell it's going to be another one of your retarded one-liners before I even scroll down.

What would convince you then, I must ask? Sounds like you just don't want to let go of the idea already in your head, despite what the actual evidence shows.

I'm not talking about 9/11, bozo. I'm talking about the invasion of Iraq, which has increased terrorist activity within it, instead of decreasing it, which would be what one expects if this "draning" bullshit was true.

Explain the bias in the post you responded to, please. I'm not seeing it. "In the early years of Christianity, Easter was the main holiday; the birth of Jesus was not celebrated. In the fourth century, church officials decided to institute the birth of Jesus as a holiday. Unfortunately, the Bible does not mention date for his birth (a fact Puritans later pointed out in order to deny the legitimacy of the celebration). Although some evidence suggests that his birth may have occurred in the spring (why would shepherds be herding in the middle of winter?), Pope Julius I chose December 25. It is commonly believed that the church chose this date in an effort to adopt and absorb the traditions of the pagan Saturnalia festival." --http://tinyurl.com/y83wg8

And you're accusing others of apples and oranges comparisons? What in the world do those two things have to do with each other, goofball?

But it does make the statement that Kearny's are the highest in Hudson Country proven false, which was the one and only thing that post addressed or was meant to address. Don't put words in my mouth.

...I hear a distinct whooshing sound. (yeah, I know, s/he isn't going to understand that either)

Excuse me, but you were the one specifically referring to atheists as people who were on the "Dark Side," stupid. Or did you forget what you wrote already?