I don't know what kind of ideal (to you, at least) theocracy you have in your head, but in this country, and this reality, to expect people to obey the law is not being "spoiled."
Are you kidding me? Who exactly stepped over that line of controversy first? If the teacher didn't want to be the center of attention, he should have known his place. He may be a preacher too, but here he was at school. A public school. Not giving a sermon at a church. He brought it on himself, and I am glad that a student had the guts to stand up to him and to people like you to uphold the Constitution.
"under god" was only added in 1954, you moron. It's a modern addition, snuck in during the Red Scare when everyone was afraid of conspiracy theories about Communist spies being everywhere. It has nothing to do with the values this nation was actually founded on.
Did you know that the USA existed for nearly two centuries before that, or did you spend all your time thinking about God in your own history class?
Of course, this is a completely unbiased statement made by someone who has a clear understanding of both the First Amendment, and has in no way prejudged or leveled ad hominem attacks against the student who stood up for the Constitution, not to mention catching his teacher in an outright lie.
Just who do you think you're kidding?
LOL, sounds like the "girls get raped because they wear skimpy clothes" type of logic. The _teacher_ is the one who did wrong (and illegal, at that). He had every right to stick up for himself, since he was right and the teacher was wrong.
The teacher deserves every bit of controversy he gets from his blatant contempt for the Establishment Clause. He brought it upon himself. I'm glad it was made into a "mountain." It serves him right to see what happens when he starts telling public school students, children he is supposed to be teaching history too, that they belong in hell.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>