Jump to content

Strife767

Members
  • Posts

    2,138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Strife767

  1. Strife767

    Class of 87 reunion

    Did a bit of searching, and apparently it was yesterday (the 24th--who knows what day "yesterday" is by the time this actually gets posted) and you just missed it. http://shorock.com/alumni/kearny/sked.html
  2. Forget your cowardly evasion: should soldiers wounded during their tours have to give back their sign-on bonuses? Yes or no? Are you capable of giving a straight answer to this question?
  3. In other words, you admit you can't answer a single one of them.
  4. Aren't there already more than enough ads around here? Geez.
  5. Because you can't. You can't give but one good reason why we have stopped pursuing the man behind the 9/11 attacks.
  6. Now, now... ...you can't be certain it's not the same person under different names.
  7. Ugh, seriously. You'd think something like this would have lots from both sides backing it up, but that is quite the difference--six times more Democrats co-sponsoring.
  8. That's because you're an imbecile. Why aren't we hunting the man who orchestrated 9/11? Let's see if you have the balls to give that question a straight answer, hotshot.
  9. Psst, you're talking to a different person now, stupid. I beg to differ.
  10. Roosevelt knew to go after the country that actually attacked us. That's more than can be said for Bush, and that's a fact.
  11. Call me crazy, but I wouldn't make a decision about an issue like this based on a 'bet.' What is your response to this post? http://forums.kearnyontheweb.com/index.php...indpost&p=74537 What would this have to do with anything? The fact is you haven't proved that there's any real way to lower taxes without having to give something up in return. Nothing but empty claims coming from you; don't forget that. If it was a courtroom, what would the case be? And any jury who would side with someone just because he makes less money isn't a good jury--that's just bias, plain and simple. Fact is, if you were under the burden of even a civil court, you wouldn't be able to win any kind of case, considering you have no hard evidence. Do you think before you type? "We" indeed. The same crowd that you threatened to "storm" a months-ago meeting with, I presume? You can probably get a lot of signatures if you lie, but if you're honest about the fact that you have no proven-to-be-viable solution to the tax level, you'll be mostly ignored just like you are here. Empty claims will get you nowhere--don't forget that.
  12. Carl Sagan explained quite well "what is so very wrong with that," I'd say: "It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." In other words, just because something is comforting does not mean it is inherently beneficial (and definitely doesn't mean it's true).
  13. Maybe a small child would have reason to find an incessent mantra of "Kool-aid" this and "Kool-aid" that to be witty, but most of us are a little more complex than that, I'm afraid. The vast majority of "2smart4u"'s posts are sophomoric personal comments about people he's never met, in response to normal, thought-out posts. You say a lot more about yourself than you probably realize by showing your support for his tripe.
  14. Santos does not actively participate on this forum. However, he is far from inaccessible--how about asking him directly? There's an idea.
  15. lol, now it's 2008. Face it--your 'threats' are totally empty (as you have displayed in the past), and it's really obvious you don't have nearly enough support to do much of anything.
  16. Someone hasn't read his own signature in a while.
  17. Jabberwocky! Haven't read that in a long time.
  18. Strife767

    Thanksgiving

    read: not you "Thou shalt keep thy religion to thyself." Ignorant fool.
  19. Call me all the infantile shit you want, but the fact is that your spineless self can do nothing but sit at a computer and insist everything's just fine while your countrymen and women continue to DIE in a country that never attacked us. You are a craven wretch, and I'm ashamed to share a species with you.
  20. Strife767

    Pelosi Is Pissed !

    The one you're posting in, obviously.
  21. (alright, that's it) They'd be pissed off because WE ATTACKED THE WRONG COUNTRY, you F**KING idiot! F**K you.
  22. Considering he's the only one out of the two of you that knows that there is no space between the end of a question and a question mark, I think you ought to look at the board in your own eye.
  23. Care to try actually reading what he writes next time?
×
×
  • Create New...