Leftist Hypocrit Exposed

[Guest 2smart4u]

That's quite a list. I'd say you were OCD.

[Guest Guest]

That's quite a list. I'd say you were OCD.

What's the matter, boy? Don't have the guts to admit that for every sex scandal on the left, there are five or ten on the right?

[Guest Guest]

See kids, this is why you want to stay away from Kool-Aid.

Again, we see 2dim's code for "You're right, I have no answer."

Concession accepted.

[billydee4]

That's quite a list. I'd say you were OCD.

2dumb4words: I'd say you have a lot of 'splainin' to do.

PatRat: Are you admitting you think oral sex is immoral? I feel sorry for you, almost.

[Guest Guest]

This is too funny!! The President of the U.S. sodomizes a young girl in the White House, lies about it under oath before Congress and a Loony refers to it as a "personal indiscretion". You gotta love it.

Given the choice between an adulterer guilty of having consensual adult sex or a supposedly reformed drunk who starts a war costing thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of $$$$ with NO benefit to the US and based on LIES for POTUS, I'll take the adulterer every time Thank You very much.

[Guest Guest]

This is too funny!! The President of the U.S. sodomizes a young girl in the White House, lies about it under oath before Congress and a Loony refers to it as a "personal indiscretion". You gotta love it.

Imagine if that had been Bush that commited that "personal indiscretion". The Loonys would be screaming for his lynching and I don't think they would be referring to it as a personal indiscretion. Just another example of leftist hypocricy.

[Guest Guest]

Imagine if that had been Bush that commited that "personal indiscretion". The Loonys would be screaming for his lynching and I don't think they would be referring to it as a personal indiscretion. Just another example of leftist hypocricy.

Typical Resmuglican possibly, maybe, could be with NO basis in reality.

[Guest Guest]

Imagine if that had been Bush that commited that "personal indiscretion". The Loonys would be screaming for his lynching and I don't think they would be referring to it as a personal indiscretion. Just another example of leftist hypocricy.

You freaking idiot! Bush lied us into a war. Not only should he have been impeached, he should have been sent to prison for the rest of his life. Lying your country into a war is treasonous.

[Guest Guest]

You freaking idiot! Bush lied us into a war. Not only should he have been impeached, he should have been sent to prison for the rest of his life. Lying your country into a war is treasonous.

So is selling missiles to an enemy but it's apparent that Resmuglicans consider treason and convenient amnesia to be endearing qualities.

[Guest Patriot]

You freaking idiot! Bush lied us into a war. Not only should he have been impeached, he should have been sent to prison for the rest of his life. Lying your country into a war is treasonous.

Are you talking about the war that the Democratic Congress approved and agreed with ??

[Guest Patriot]

You freaking idiot! Bush lied us into a war. Not only should he have been impeached, he should have been sent to prison for the rest of his life. Lying your country into a war is treasonous.

More loony leftist ramblings from the Kool-Aid sideshow, very boring.

[Guest Guest]

Are you talking about the war that the Democratic Congress approved and agreed with ??

Thet voted based on Dumbya's LIES1

Of course YOU no longer (IF you ever did) understand the difference between lies and facts you've been lapping up Bush's meaningless sound bites like a puppy at a bowl of milk for so long.

Mission Accomplished!

THEY have WMDs!

Bring it on!

WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP!

[Guest Guest]

Are you talking about the war that the Democratic Congress approved and agreed with ??

Idiot,

As people like you never tired of reminding us, the president has access to information that members of Congress do not, and therefore is entitled to deference from Congress in military matters. The executive branch controls the intelligence agencies and in this case selected and de-selected intelligence information depending on whether it suited the neocons' preconceieved agenda, formed before Bush ever took office, of declaring war against Iraq. 9/11 was just a convenient excuse, and the war against Iraq was perpetrated by lies and deceptions.

It is because the president stands in such a high position of trust that a betrayal of that trust is the most serious of offenses against our country.

[Guest Keith]

More loony leftist ramblings from the Kool-Aid sideshow, very boring.

Yeah right, as if "loony leftist" and "Kool-Aid" haven't been beaten in the the ground with a fury that's hard to fathom. It's just more of the same two tired old phrases from the resident douchebag. It is you my friend that is boring.

[Guest Patriot]

Idiot,

As people like you never tired of reminding us, the president has access to information that members of Congress do not, and therefore is entitled to deference from Congress in military matters. The executive branch controls the intelligence agencies and in this case selected and de-selected intelligence information depending on whether it suited the neocons' preconceieved agenda, formed before Bush ever took office, of declaring war against Iraq. 9/11 was just a convenient excuse, and the war against Iraq was perpetrated by lies and deceptions.

It is because the president stands in such a high position of trust that a betrayal of that trust is the most serious of offenses against our country.

"in this case selected and de-selected intelligence information" ?? WOW !! You're privy to some very secret data, you must have very high level connections.

I'm impressed.

[Bern]

Idiot,

As people like you never tired of reminding us, the president has access to information that members of Congress do not, and therefore is entitled to deference from Congress in military matters. The executive branch controls the intelligence agencies and in this case selected and de-selected intelligence information depending on whether it suited the neocons' preconceieved agenda, formed before Bush ever took office, of declaring war against Iraq. 9/11 was just a convenient excuse, and the war against Iraq was perpetrated by lies and deceptions.

It is because the president stands in such a high position of trust that a betrayal of that trust is the most serious of offenses against our country.

The congress owes the president little deference. The deference should be from the president to the congress, which constitutionally is given the job to declare war and fund the whole government (which includes the military). If the executive branch refuses to give congress needed info, then subpoena it. You cannot enact good laws and set intelligent national policy when the congress is denied information. If the executive refuses the subpoena then impeach and remove the president.

If the congress asserted its powers, you will find the executive branch will come to heel very quickly.

Do you really believe our constitutional founders believed in the unitary executive or felt the executive can be trusted? No way. They had enough of kings and distrusted a powerful executive.

That is why they gave the congress, a large group of men, a power not given to other branches of the government. The power to remove members from their and the other two branches.

[Guest Guest]

"in this case selected and de-selected intelligence information" ?? WOW !! You're privy to some very secret data, you must have very high level connections.

I'm impressed.

Actually, it's public knowledge that intelligence was cherry-picked now, 2dim.

[Guest Guest]

"in this case selected and de-selected intelligence information" ?? WOW !! You're privy to some very secret data, you must have very high level connections.

I'm impressed.

You should be impressed, dumbo. Obviously it's far beyond your limited comprehension. The cherry-picking of intelligence data by the Bush administration has been extensively documented.

[Guest 2smart4u]

The congress owes the president little deference. The deference should be from the president to the congress, which constitutionally is given the job to declare war and fund the whole government (which includes the military). If the executive branch refuses to give congress needed info, then subpoena it. You cannot enact good laws and set intelligent national policy when the congress is denied information. If the executive refuses the subpoena then impeach and remove the president.

If the congress asserted its powers, you will find the executive branch will come to heel very quickly.

Do you really believe our constitutional founders believed in the unitary executive or felt the executive can be trusted? No way. They had enough of kings and distrusted a powerful executive.

That is why they gave the congress, a large group of men, a power not given to other branches of the government. The power to remove members from their and the other two branches.

Bern, The Loony Left doesn't deal in fact. Your accurate description of Congression powers doesn't fit well with the "Bush lied us into war" scenario favored by those who drink from the Kool-Aid cup.

[Bern]

Bern, The Loony Left doesn't deal in fact. Your accurate description of Congression powers doesn't fit well with the "Bush lied us into war" scenario favored by those who drink from the Kool-Aid cup.

You and I disagree on most things but here we agree. Of course, many Democrats will say they did not control congress but what is the excuse for the last two years?

They told us to vote Democratic and things will change. An example is this Pelosi statement before the 2006 elections:

“With record gas prices, record CEO pay packages, and record oil company profits, Speaker Hastert and the Majority Congress continue to give the American people empty rhetoric rather than join Democrats who are working to lower gas prices now.

“Democrats have a commonsense plan to help bring down skyrocketing gas prices by cracking down on price gouging, rolling back the billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies, tax breaks and royalty relief given to big oil and gas companies, and increasing production of alternative fuels.” - Nancy Pelosi Press Release

http://www.house.gov/pelosi/press/releases...ubberstamp.html

Where is the plan? Now that they have congress, is it a secret?

Whereupon, they play you by telling you to again vote democratic for change. Fool me once . . .

[WilliamK]

Bern, The Loony Left doesn't deal in fact. Your accurate description of Congression powers doesn't fit well with the "Bush lied us into war" scenario favored by those who drink from the Kool-Aid cup.

It fits just fine. All it means is that the members of Congress who went along with the war are not without blame. It's true that they were misled. But they had both a responsibility and a means to discover the deception. They screwed up. They trusted Bush.

The question of whether Bush lied to justify the war is not even in play any more. The deniers are in the same category as moon landing deniers, flat-earthers, "WTC was really brought down by previously prepared explosives" nuts, Uri Geller believers, and David Icke followers.

[Guest Guest]

Bern, The Loony Left doesn't deal in fact. Your accurate description of Congression powers doesn't fit well with the "Bush lied us into war" scenario favored by those who drink from the Kool-Aid cup.

So just WHAT part of Commander in Chief IS it that says the final decision to go IS NOT his?

Or did you miss that lesson while you were busy making ANOTHER ASININE Kool-Aid remark?

[Bern]

So just WHAT part of Commander in Chief IS it that says the final decision to go IS NOT his?

Or did you miss that lesson while you were busy making ANOTHER ASININE Kool-Aid remark?

I always felt that the Commander in Chief title is really to indicate to all that a civilian is in charge of our military, not some Generalissimo.

Being CinC should not give the CinC the preeminent right to set policy or at his whim to divert our military into adventures or hide things from the congress.

[Guest 2smart4u]

You and I disagree on most things but here we agree. Of course, many Democrats will say they did not control congress but what is the excuse for the last two years?

They told us to vote Democratic and things will change. An example is this Pelosi statement before the 2006 elections:

Where is the plan? Now that they have congress, is it a secret?

Whereupon, they play you by telling you to again vote democratic for change. Fool me once . . .

Nancy Pelosi's democratic congress has been virtually comatose, they have the lowest approval rating in history. They have accomplished nothing. Oh wait, check that...... they approved a bridge to nowhere.

[Guest Guest]

I always felt that the Commander in Chief title is really to indicate to all that a civilian is in charge of our military, not some Generalissimo.

Being CinC should not give the CinC the preeminent right to set policy or at his whim to divert our military into adventures or hide things from the congress.

What should/should not be and what is are vastly different things in today's world.

Watching the news about the Democratic convention showed it to be not much more than a lobbyist feeding frenzy, a target rich environment for corporate America to buy themselves a Congressman or two. Anyone with open eyes knows the Republican convention will be more of the same. The government has been sold and the people couldn't afford it. Government for the people has become nothing but another meaningless sound bite. I don'y beliee it will be all that long before we sell the naming rights to America, in the same manner athletic arena naming rights are sold today, welcome to China West.