Bryan Posted February 26, 2008 Report Share Posted February 26, 2008 I wonder how many in this forum have acutally watched this documentary. I was nominated for an Oscar. Congratulations! That's quite an accomplishment even if you didn't win. Did you go to the ceremony? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted February 26, 2008 Report Share Posted February 26, 2008 I wonder how many in this forum have acutally watched this documentary. I was nominated for an Oscar. I doubt many of these neocon scum would have the guts to sit through it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted February 26, 2008 Report Share Posted February 26, 2008 I wonder how many in this forum have acutally watched this documentary. I was nominated for an Oscar. You were nominated for an Oscar ??? Was it for playing a Blame America First, leftist Kool-Aid drinking fool ??? You would have no trouble with that part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted February 27, 2008 Report Share Posted February 27, 2008 You were nominated for an Oscar ??? Missing a "t" on a two-letter word, a simple typo, is nothing compared to your multiple question marks and the inexplicable space between them and the last word. Now, to reiterate in terms you can understand: your grammar is worse, punk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted February 27, 2008 Report Share Posted February 27, 2008 I doubt many of these neocon scum would have the guts to sit through it. If Keith had told us earlier about his Oscar nomination maybe we'd have searched it out. I watched part of the documentary. It calls Habeas corpus a fundamental right without noting that it is a Constitutional right. Applying Constitutional rights to illegal combatants in foreign countries would be the height of stupidity. Asking our soldiers to observe some analog to a Miranda reading while engaged in combat simply doesn't make sense. Moreover, it makes little sense to accord the protections of the Geneva Conventions to fighting force that preferentially attacks civilian targets. It's like sending out a side of soccer players to play Australian Rules football where the former stick with the rules and conventions of soccer. The Geneva Conventions aimed to create a humane style of warfare between signatory nations. They've never worked particularly well in the first place, and trying to apply the Conventions to fighters who do not even represent a particular nation and deliberately ignore the Conventions in the first place is folly. By failing to note the context in law for Habeas corpus, the documentary reveals itself as a biased piece of work. Take it with a grain of salt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Keith Posted March 1, 2008 Report Share Posted March 1, 2008 If Keith had told us earlier about his Oscar nomination maybe we'd have searched it out.I watched part of the documentary. It calls Habeas corpus a fundamental right without noting that it is a Constitutional right. Applying Constitutional rights to illegal combatants in foreign countries would be the height of stupidity. Asking our soldiers to observe some analog to a Miranda reading while engaged in combat simply doesn't make sense. Moreover, it makes little sense to accord the protections of the Geneva Conventions to fighting force that preferentially attacks civilian targets. It's like sending out a side of soccer players to play Australian Rules football where the former stick with the rules and conventions of soccer. The Geneva Conventions aimed to create a humane style of warfare between signatory nations. They've never worked particularly well in the first place, and trying to apply the Conventions to fighters who do not even represent a particular nation and deliberately ignore the Conventions in the first place is folly. By failing to note the context in law for Habeas corpus, the documentary reveals itself as a biased piece of work. Take it with a grain of salt. It's obvious you barely watched any of the documentary. Why don't you watch the entire thing and then make a comment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Posted March 2, 2008 Report Share Posted March 2, 2008 It's obvious you barely watched any of the documentary. Why don't you watch the entire thing and then make a comment It's obvious that you're avoiding dealing with the criticism I've already made. But at least you were able to do it without talking about recruiting! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 2, 2008 Report Share Posted March 2, 2008 It's obvious that you're avoiding dealing with the criticism I've already made. But at least you were able to do it without talking about recruiting! It's obvious that Keith is right: You didn't watch it, yet you presume to criticize it. And of course, what post from you that touches on the law would be complete without your displaying your abysmal ignorance on the subject? Habeas corpus and Miranda warnings are completely separate things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Educator Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 Missing a "t" on a two-letter word, a simple typo, is nothing compared to your multiple question marks and the inexplicable space between them and the last word.Now, to reiterate in terms you can understand: your grammar is worse, punk. "inexplicable space" ?? Intellectually challenged I see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 "inexplicable space" ?? Yes (still seeing the same stupid punctuation mistake, a mistake not even a grade-schooler would be caught making. Hope you're proud), as in 'there is no reasonable explanation for making such an obvious and idiotic error over and over again.' Intellectually challenged I see. I'm not the one who doesn't know how to punctuate sentences. Do you project this strongly often? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 Yes (still seeing the same stupid punctuation mistake, a mistake not even a grade-schooler would be caught making. Hope you're proud), as in 'there is no reasonable explanation for making such an obvious and idiotic error over and over again.'I'm not the one who doesn't know how to punctuate sentences. Do you project this strongly often? I wonder what Fraude would think about a Punctuation Fetish ? (Oh my gosh, I made one of those inexplicable spaces too) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 I wonder what Fraude would think about a Punctuation Fetish ? (Oh my gosh, I made one of those inexplicable spaces too) Who the hell is Fraude? Just another of your errors? Thank God 01/20/2009 will see the end of at least 2 of them. Bye Dumbya. By Dick. Don't let the door hit your D**ba**es on the way out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 I wonder what Fraude would think about a Punctuation Fetish ? (Oh my gosh, I made one of those inexplicable spaces too) That's "Freud" of course. Pardon my slip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest *Autonomous* Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 That's "Freud" of course. Pardon my slip. Why should we? You never do. The thing is, a typo is simply an error. What you do is purposely disrespect the language of Milton and Shakespeare in order to give your posts all the gravitas of a .txt message from a fourteen-year-old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 Why should we? You never do. The thing is, a typo is simply an error. What you do is purposely disrespect the language of Milton and Shakespeare in order to give your posts all the gravitas of a .txt message from a fourteen-year-old. Are you on drugs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Are you on drugs? Good job proving his point, imbecile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest *Autonomous* Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Are you on drugs? What a shock. Another 'Guest' sticking up for 2Dumb. We see through you, dimwit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.