Jump to content

An analogy for Dummys


Guest 2smart4u
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest 2smart4u

Here's an analogy that even the Kearny Loonys should be able to grasp. Consider the election in Nov. as the last exit on a highway to disaster. If we stay on this highway and reelect zerO, we'll be faced with bankruptcy, high interest rates, massive unemployment and greatly reduced military capability.

If we take the exit off this highway to disaster and dump zerO, we'll back away from the cliff, begin to get our house in order and control spending.

It's time for the Loonys to put the pipe down, sober up and wise up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an analogy that even the Kearny Loonys should be able to grasp. Consider the election in Nov. as the last exit on a highway to disaster. If we stay on this highway and reelect zerO, we'll be faced with bankruptcy, high interest rates, massive unemployment and greatly reduced military capability.

If we take the exit off this highway to disaster and dump zerO, we'll back away from the cliff, begin to get our house in order and control spending.

It's time for the Loonys to put the pipe down, sober up and wise up.

You pay a higher percentage on your income than Mitt Romney, and you're cool with that. Consider yourself the biggest tool pushover on this forum, you F**KING idiot. Get a F**KING clue. Your fanboy admiration of rich men in America is as pathetic as a schoolgirl's fascination with the boys from Twilight. Rather than voting with your wallet, your class status or other factors that result in tangible +/-, you'll vote based on which Republican candidate best suits your "values," which include, apparently, cheating on wives, lobbying, tax evasion, corporate buyouts and general unintelligence.

-KO

PS: Obama caught bin Laden! Not BUSH!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an analogy that even the Kearny Loonys should be able to grasp. Consider the election in Nov. as the last exit on a highway to disaster. If we stay on this highway and reelect zerO, we'll be faced with bankruptcy, high interest rates, massive unemployment and greatly reduced military capability.

If we take the exit off this highway to disaster and dump zerO, we'll back away from the cliff, begin to get our house in order and control spending.

It's time for the Loonys to put the pipe down, sober up and wise up.

Classic! The self proclaimed 2 smart doesn't know the plural of dummy is NOT dummys. As head dummy you should know this.

Ps: spell check is your friend -use it, dummy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right, that's an analogy for dummies - who can't spell. Here's analogy for intelligent people.

Bush ran the bus off the road in 2008 with 300 million people on board. It crashed and virtually everyone was seriously injured, except for a few hedge fund managers who were betting on it happening and a few bankers who got way more from the bailout than they deserved. Millions of people lost their homes, their livelihoods and their life-savings. The rescue squad arrived a few months later and started trying to salvage the disaster but the costs are enormous. That's what happens when you give the keys to a knuckle-dragging cowboy who doesn't know anything about economics except how many millions he has left from Daddy's fortune. And now that we have the bus at least moving forward again, we aren't about to give the keys back to the same crowd so they can crash it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You pay a higher percentage on your income than Mitt Romney, and you're cool with that. Consider yourself the biggest tool pushover on this forum, you F**KING idiot. Get a F**KING clue. Your fanboy admiration of rich men in America is as pathetic as a schoolgirl's fascination with the boys from Twilight. Rather than voting with your wallet, your class status or other factors that result in tangible +/-, you'll vote based on which Republican candidate best suits your "values," which include, apparently, cheating on wives, lobbying, tax evasion, corporate buyouts and general unintelligence.

-KO

PS: Obama caught bin Laden! Not BUSH!!!!!!

Wrong... The United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group caught Bin Laden, using Intelligence gathered by CIA, DIA and other agencies through extensive and enhanced interrogation of insurgents captured and transported to Guantanamo, and other facilities. The Only Risk Obama took was the possibility of a Paper Cut as he signed the Authorization. The FUNNY thing is that Bin laden was caught SOLELY because of those same "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" that Obama campaigned against, and the Leftists railed against. Simple fact is that they had the information several weeks before the raid, and the confirmation for over 30 hours that he was in fact present, with the DEVGRU team standing by while the White House dithered, and waited to give them the go ahead...we ALMOST lost him because of it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kearny Senior

You pay a higher percentage on your income than Mitt Romney, and you're cool with that. Consider yourself the biggest tool pushover on this forum, you F**KING idiot. Get a F**KING clue. Your fanboy admiration of rich men in America is as pathetic as a schoolgirl's fascination with the boys from Twilight. Rather than voting with your wallet, your class status or other factors that result in tangible +/-, you'll vote based on which Republican candidate best suits your "values," which include, apparently, cheating on wives, lobbying, tax evasion, corporate buyouts and general unintelligence.

-KO

PS: Obama caught bin Laden! Not BUSH!!!!!!

What does it say about the Obama administration when the best thing a supporter can say is "Obama

caught bin Laden", when in fact the Navy Seals planned and carried out the operation while Obama just happened to be the occupant of the white house at the time. Pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does it say about the Obama administration when the best thing a supporter can say is "Obama

caught bin Laden", when in fact the Navy Seals planned and carried out the operation while Obama just happened to be the occupant of the white house at the time. Pathetic.

Yikes are you really that clueless or are you off your meds again? The Commander in Chief authorized it - it was in all the papers. Never served I guess? Clueless about how a chain of command works?

And to think he was able to do this without a " mission accomplished" banner. Now go back to your checker game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Patriot

Wrong... The United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group caught Bin Laden, using Intelligence gathered by CIA, DIA and other agencies through extensive and enhanced interrogation of insurgents captured and transported to Guantanamo, and other facilities. The Only Risk Obama took was the possibility of a Paper Cut as he signed the Authorization. The FUNNY thing is that Bin laden was caught SOLELY because of those same "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" that Obama campaigned against, and the Leftists railed against. Simple fact is that they had the information several weeks before the raid, and the confirmation for over 30 hours that he was in fact present, with the DEVGRU team standing by while the White House dithered, and waited to give them the go ahead...we ALMOST lost him because of it as well.

Not fair!! You're injecting hard facts into the fable the Loonies love to tell about their hero, who is in reality an anti-military socialist. His recent decision to make major cuts in the military( F-35 air superiority fighters, naval ships, 100,000 soldiers, pay freezes, increased medical insurance costs

to name a few) while making NO CUTS in the entitlement programs that take the biggest part of government spending is solid proof of his socialist bearings. It would be comical if it wasn't so pathetic that the the zerO supporters hold up their herO as a champion of our troops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 2smart4u

You pay a higher percentage on your income than Mitt Romney, and you're cool with that. Consider yourself the biggest tool pushover on this forum, you F**KING idiot. Get a F**KING clue. Your fanboy admiration of rich men in America is as pathetic as a schoolgirl's fascination with the boys from Twilight. Rather than voting with your wallet, your class status or other factors that result in tangible +/-, you'll vote based on which Republican candidate best suits your "values," which include, apparently, cheating on wives, lobbying, tax evasion, corporate buyouts and general unintelligence.

-KO

PS: Obama caught bin Laden! Not BUSH!!!!!!

It's obvious you're clueless about the differences between taxes on capital gains and taxes on income.

But that's OK, have another Bud and be secure in the satisfaction that you just told me off and called me names. PS: You're also wrong about zerO "catching" bin Laden. I saw the tape of zerO sipping tea in the white house with Hilliary while the Navy Seals were risking their lives to kill bin Laden. But hey, I understand. Since zerO has accomplished nothing, nada, zilch in his 3 years, you have to grasp at something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does it say about the Obama administration when the best thing a supporter can say is "Obama

caught bin Laden", when in fact the Navy Seals planned and carried out the operation while Obama just happened to be the occupant of the white house at the time. Pathetic.

I only said that to get under your wrinkly, age-spotted skin, old man. Mission accomplished. Everybody on this forum knows that I don't agree with wasting money chasing invisible terrorists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does it say about the Obama administration when the best thing a supporter can say is "Obama

caught bin Laden", when in fact the Navy Seals planned and carried out the operation while Obama just happened to be the occupant of the white house at the time. Pathetic.

Senior moment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Psst...hey guest-you might want to check snopes, politifact, truthorfiction, or pretty much any fact-checking site before proudly proclaiming spam e-mail info as fact. Even Fox News debunked your version of events..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kearny Senior

Classic! The self proclaimed 2 smart doesn't know the plural of dummy is NOT dummys. As head dummy you should know this.

Ps: spell check is your friend -use it, dummy.

OK, let me try to understand your thought processes. The previous poster raises many serious issues about Obama and your response is about a typo?? Get in the game son, our country's going down the tubes with Obama and you're oblivious (did I spell that right)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Proud American

Wrong... The United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group caught Bin Laden, using Intelligence gathered by CIA, DIA and other agencies through extensive and enhanced interrogation of insurgents captured and transported to Guantanamo, and other facilities. The Only Risk Obama took was the possibility of a Paper Cut as he signed the Authorization. The FUNNY thing is that Bin laden was caught SOLELY because of those same "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" that Obama campaigned against, and the Leftists railed against. Simple fact is that they had the information several weeks before the raid, and the confirmation for over 30 hours that he was in fact present, with the DEVGRU team standing by while the White House dithered, and waited to give them the go ahead...we ALMOST lost him because of it as well.

It's been widely reported that the leads that resulted in the Bin Laden capture were developed by covert CIA agents living in Pakistan. Waterboarding and other techniques that are considered "torture" under the Geneva Convention were not part of the intelligence operation that resulted in the capture.

The capture of Bin Laden was brought about by CIA and Pentagon intelligence and executed by the highly trained special naval group. President appointed the CIA Director and reappointed the Secretary of Defense who were critical in the intelligence gathering and plan development. He appointed the Secretary who oversees the special seal unit. And President Obama signed the order to proceed with the raid.

In October 1980, the United States failed in its rescue attempt of US citizens held hostage in Tehran, Iran. Using your argument, are the military personnel who valiantly attempted the rescue, and were killed, responsible for the failure of the rescue attempt? My recollection is that Republicans, including candidate Ronald Reagan, blamed then President Jimmy Carter.

President Obama held a private recognition ceremony at the White House for the brave members of the unit who captured Bin Lden. We all honor their daring mission. We should also recognize the intelligence gathering that made it possible and the President of the United States who authorized it. I'm certain if the mission had not been successful, you would be the first one to blame President Obama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Reading is your Friend

It's been widely reported that the leads that resulted in the Bin Laden capture were developed by covert CIA agents living in Pakistan. Waterboarding and other techniques that are considered "torture" under the Geneva Convention were not part of the intelligence operation that resulted in the capture.

The capture of Bin Laden was brought about by CIA and Pentagon intelligence and executed by the highly trained special naval group. President appointed the CIA Director and reappointed the Secretary of Defense who were critical in the intelligence gathering and plan development. He appointed the Secretary who oversees the special seal unit. And President Obama signed the order to proceed with the raid.

In October 1980, the United States failed in its rescue attempt of US citizens held hostage in Tehran, Iran. Using your argument, are the military personnel who valiantly attempted the rescue, and were killed, responsible for the failure of the rescue attempt? My recollection is that Republicans, including candidate Ronald Reagan, blamed then President Jimmy Carter.

President Obama held a private recognition ceremony at the White House for the brave members of the unit who captured Bin Lden. We all honor their daring mission. We should also recognize the intelligence gathering that made it possible and the President of the United States who authorized it. I'm certain if the mission had not been successful, you would be the first one to blame President Obama.

President Carter was directly involved int he planning for that raid, and had made decisoons to include assets that had not trained together to make it a more "Rounded" (HIS words) effort and not leave all the Credit solely to one Agency. The Inclusion of a Marine Heavy-Lift helicopter unit that had not trained for that particular type of operation or environment led directly to the failure of that mission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's obvious you're clueless about the differences between taxes on capital gains and taxes on income.

But that's OK, have another Bud and be secure in the satisfaction that you just told me off and called me names. PS: You're also wrong about zerO "catching" bin Laden. I saw the tape of zerO sipping tea in the white house with Hilliary while the Navy Seals were risking their lives to kill bin Laden. But hey, I understand. Since zerO has accomplished nothing, nada, zilch in his 3 years, you have to grasp at something.

Do you understand how off-shore bank accounts work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, let me try to understand your thought processes. The previous poster raises many serious issues about Obama and your response is about a typo?? Get in the game son, our country's going down the tubes with Obama and you're oblivious (did I spell that right)?

Sorry old timer. It's your generation who handed this steaming pile of crap to us. Thanks, we're in the game because you dropped the ball.

Btw: not a typo, it was just wrong and when you're 2smart4 everyone, you should have higher standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Proud American

President Carter was directly involved int he planning for that raid, and had made decisoons to include assets that had not trained together to make it a more "Rounded" (HIS words) effort and not leave all the Credit solely to one Agency. The Inclusion of a Marine Heavy-Lift helicopter unit that had not trained for that particular type of operation or environment led directly to the failure of that mission.

Precisely. A failure in leadership and group think in the Carter White House. President Carter, his Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Staff and head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff urged Carter to proceed. Only National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski opposed the mission and he was excluded from all the planning meetings.

Contrast that with the repeated planning sessions in the White House with Obama, Clinton, Gates, Biden, Navy Admiral/Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen in 2011:

Obama led five meetings of the National Security Council over two and a half months, focused solely on whether bin Laden was in the compound and, if so, how to get him, the official said. On April 29, Obama approved the operation to kill bin Laden before he left on a trip to witness the tornado damage in the South.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Patriot

Precisely. A failure in leadership and group think in the Carter White House. President Carter, his Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Staff and head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff urged Carter to proceed. Only National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski opposed the mission and he was excluded from all the planning meetings.

Contrast that with the repeated planning sessions in the White House with Obama, Clinton, Gates, Biden, Navy Admiral/Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen in 2011:

Obama led five meetings of the National Security Council over two and a half months, focused solely on whether bin Laden was in the compound and, if so, how to get him, the official said. On April 29, Obama approved the operation to kill bin Laden before he left on a trip to witness the tornado damage in the South.

I realize zerO has no accomplishments(except for putting us on the edge of bankruptcy) for you Loonies to get excited about, but really, zerO didn't fly into that compound risking his life, the Navy Seals did. zerO didn't plan the mission, the Navy Seals did. All zerO did was put a required signature

on the plan. If the mission had failed the plan would have been blamed, not the signature. You Loonies are so hungry for something to be proud of zerO for, you're obsessed with the fantasy that zerO killed bin Laden. But I suppose if I were a Loony and had supported a failed socialist for POTUS, I would be also anxious about finding something/anything to crow about. Just be aware that you're going to be eating that crow on Nov.20th. and I'll be here to make sure you eat every last bite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Calling You OUt

I realize zerO has no accomplishments(except for putting us on the edge of bankruptcy) for you Loonies to get excited about, but really, zerO didn't fly into that compound risking his life, the Navy Seals did. zerO didn't plan the mission, the Navy Seals did. All zerO did was put a required signature

on the plan. If the mission had failed the plan would have been blamed, not the signature. You Loonies are so hungry for something to be proud of zerO for, you're obsessed with the fantasy that zerO killed bin Laden. But I suppose if I were a Loony and had supported a failed socialist for POTUS, I would be also anxious about finding something/anything to crow about. Just be aware that you're going to be eating that crow on Nov.20th. and I'll be here to make sure you eat every last bite.

, said Patriot, the intellectually depthless and incessantly carping poster on this board who spends every breathing moment repeating Tea Party talking points while refusing to tell us whether he's supporting Willard ("Mitt") Romney or Newton Leroy ("Newt") Gingrich for President. Yes, that is their real names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Precisely. A failure in leadership and group think in the Carter White House. President Carter, his Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Staff and head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff urged Carter to proceed. Only National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski opposed the mission and he was excluded from all the planning meetings.

Contrast that with the repeated planning sessions in the White House with Obama, Clinton, Gates, Biden, Navy Admiral/Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen in 2011:

Obama led five meetings of the National Security Council over two and a half months, focused solely on whether bin Laden was in the compound and, if so, how to get him, the official said. On April 29, Obama approved the operation to kill bin Laden before he left on a trip to witness the tornado damage in the South.

No....again you got it wrong. Eagle Claw's OPPlan, as written by Beckwith, would have succeeded. Beckwith took all of the lessons learned after Son Tay and coupled them with his specially trained unit, and presented the JCS with a complete, comprehensive operations order that ONLY needed a Signature. His men were already practicing in a remote corner of Bragg, and could do the entire operation pretty much in their sleep. THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG WITH GOING IN THERE...The JCS SHOULD have had the guts to tell carter No when he started playing his Hyman Rickover Games, and micromanaging the situation..they didnt do so, Carter interfered on a level that he had NO BUSINESS even commenting on (of course this is the same President who used to personally schedule who would use the White

House tennis courts), and a lot of good people died who did not have to...and in Doing so he sealed his reputation as one of our more Inept presidents, where if the had left well enough alone and stayed in his lane, the success would have more than likely guaranteed him a second term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among President Obama's accomplishments:

1. Saved the American economy from collapse and guided it back onto a sounder path after Bush wrecked it.

2. Restored American standing in the world on foreign policy. Won the Nobel Peace prize for turning around American foreign policy. Took us off the destructive course set under Bush.

3. Ended Bush's idiotic war in Iraq.

4. Decimated Al Qaeda, including the killing of bin Laden.

5. Kept America and Americans safe. There have been no successful terrorist attacks against us under President Obama.

6. Got national health care legislation enacted, something presidents have been trying to do since Theodore Roosevelt.

President Obama has acted responsibly, coolly and professionally as the opposition has tried to tear him down. They have opposed everything he has tried to do, even things they used to favor. They never even pretended to give him a chance. They are more interested in seeing him fail than in seeing the country succeed. They do not deserve to be returned to power. President Obama has earned our trust and respect, and another four year term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...