Jump to content

21 Czars and counting


Guest 2smart4u
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest 2smart4u

The annointed one has now appointed 21 Czars to oversee various areas of government. The danger here is the Czars report to the President and are not subject to Congressional oversight. And wonder of wonders, there is no outrage from the Defeatocratic Congress or the NY Slimes (or any of the far left media).

Obama is slowly but surely turning the U.S. into a European style socialist country. He has already put our next 3 generations heavily in debt and he's only been in office 6 months and now he's creating a secret government with his personal Czars.

On a positive note, in 3.5 years the annointed one will be thrown out by clear-thinking Americans. A Republican will become President, fire the Czars and begin to reclaim America from Europe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Keith
The annointed one has now appointed 21 Czars to oversee various areas of government. The danger here is the Czars report to the President and are not subject to Congressional oversight. And wonder of wonders, there is no outrage from the Defeatocratic Congress or the NY Slimes (or any of the far left media).

Obama is slowly but surely turning the U.S. into a European style socialist country. He has already put our next 3 generations heavily in debt and he's only been in office 6 months and now he's creating a secret government with his personal Czars.

On a positive note, in 3.5 years the annointed one will be thrown out by clear-thinking Americans. A Republican will become President, fire the Czars and begin to reclaim America from Europe.

Geez, could you take your head out of Rush's ass and take a breath once in a while? Don't you have a shooting spree or an abortion doctor to kill to get you away from the computer and out of the house for a while?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest
Geez, could you take your head out of Rush's ass and take a breath once in a while? Don't you have a shooting spree or an abortion doctor to kill to get you away from the computer and out of the house for a while?

He can't afford it. It is obvious from his and of his sock puppets many posts that he is a bitter home bound loser that can't afford to do anything else but sit in front of a computer venting spleen.

The world passed him by ages ago but he won't know because he never gets to go out. Probably has home bound social services delivering him food, washing him and cleaning him up

Why anyone even dignifies him by responding to any of his nasty and silly posts is beyond me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest
Geez, could you take your head out of Rush's ass and take a breath once in a while? Don't you have a shooting spree or an abortion doctor to kill to get you away from the computer and out of the house for a while?

What we have here is a severe case of BDS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest
He can't afford it. It is obvious from his and of his sock puppets many posts that he is a bitter home bound loser that can't afford to do anything else but sit in front of a computer venting spleen.

The world passed him by ages ago but he won't know because he never gets to go out. Probably has home bound social services delivering him food, washing him and cleaning him up

Why anyone even dignifies him by responding to any of his nasty and silly posts is beyond me.

Everything he said was accurate. You may not agree with his politics, he obviously didn't vote for Obama, and you obviously did. Your comments are typical of the angry far left, smear anyone that doesn't agree with the liberal BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a positive note, in 3.5 years the annointed one will be thrown out by clear-thinking Americans. A Republican will become President, fire the Czars and begin to reclaim America from Europe.

Woo hoo! Another 2smart4u prediction. I'll add it to the collection:

"So they're stuck with Mrs. Bubba, and not happy about the prospect of putting her up against Giuliani or Thompson." - 2smart4u, Aug 27 2007

"Don't think so. Obama can't catch the Ice Queen. But regardless, Giuliani is

the next president." - 2smart4u, Sep 13 2007

"By Nov. McCain will have a cake walk into the White House." - 2smart4u, Apr 13 2008

"'President Obama' ?? That ain't gonna happen, sweetie." - 2smart4u, May 17 2008

"... It's just another reason why Obama can't win" - 2smart4u, Jun 24 2008

"Not to worry, Obama is not getting elected. Remember where you heard it first and who told you." - 2smart4u, Jun 24 2008

"I can't wait to see the reaction of the Loonies when their messiah loses. [...] I really CAN'T WAIT to come on KOTW and gloat." - 2smart4u, Aug 6 2008

"Factor in the white guilt vote and the Hillary voters and McCain may carry all 50 states." - 2smart4u, Aug 26 2008

"... they will guarantee a McCain/Palin victory. 80% of Americans will reject the angry and mean-spirited attacks and will support Palin because of them." - 2smart4u, Sep 2 2008

"Sarah Palin became VP last night, 2 months before the election. [...] Women voters will decide this election and there's no question who they'll be voting for." - 2smart4u, Sep 4 2008

"... the fact is Palin is the new rock star in this campaign and the female vote is going to make her the next VP." - 2smart4u, Sep 5 2008

"After the election in Nov. when Sarah Palin becomes V.P. ..." - 2smart4u, Sep 11 2008

"... McCain may make this election a clean sweep." - 2smart4u, Sep 16 2008

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 2smart4u
Woo hoo! Another 2smart4u prediction. I'll add it to the collection:

"So they're stuck with Mrs. Bubba, and not happy about the prospect of putting her up against Giuliani or Thompson." - 2smart4u, Aug 27 2007

"Don't think so. Obama can't catch the Ice Queen. But regardless, Giuliani is

the next president." - 2smart4u, Sep 13 2007

"By Nov. McCain will have a cake walk into the White House." - 2smart4u, Apr 13 2008

"'President Obama' ?? That ain't gonna happen, sweetie." - 2smart4u, May 17 2008

"... It's just another reason why Obama can't win" - 2smart4u, Jun 24 2008

"Not to worry, Obama is not getting elected. Remember where you heard it first and who told you." - 2smart4u, Jun 24 2008

"I can't wait to see the reaction of the Loonies when their messiah loses. [...] I really CAN'T WAIT to come on KOTW and gloat." - 2smart4u, Aug 6 2008

"Factor in the white guilt vote and the Hillary voters and McCain may carry all 50 states." - 2smart4u, Aug 26 2008

"... they will guarantee a McCain/Palin victory. 80% of Americans will reject the angry and mean-spirited attacks and will support Palin because of them." - 2smart4u, Sep 2 2008

"Sarah Palin became VP last night, 2 months before the election. [...] Women voters will decide this election and there's no question who they'll be voting for." - 2smart4u, Sep 4 2008

"... the fact is Palin is the new rock star in this campaign and the female vote is going to make her the next VP." - 2smart4u, Sep 5 2008

"After the election in Nov. when Sarah Palin becomes V.P. ..." - 2smart4u, Sep 11 2008

"... McCain may make this election a clean sweep." - 2smart4u, Sep 16 2008

I'm humbled by your devotion to me, I'll send you my autograph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woo hoo! Another 2smart4u prediction. I'll add it to the collection:

"So they're stuck with Mrs. Bubba, and not happy about the prospect of putting her up against Giuliani or Thompson." - 2smart4u, Aug 27 2007

"Don't think so. Obama can't catch the Ice Queen. But regardless, Giuliani is

the next president." - 2smart4u, Sep 13 2007

"By Nov. McCain will have a cake walk into the White House." - 2smart4u, Apr 13 2008

"'President Obama' ?? That ain't gonna happen, sweetie." - 2smart4u, May 17 2008

"... It's just another reason why Obama can't win" - 2smart4u, Jun 24 2008

"Not to worry, Obama is not getting elected. Remember where you heard it first and who told you." - 2smart4u, Jun 24 2008

"I can't wait to see the reaction of the Loonies when their messiah loses. [...] I really CAN'T WAIT to come on KOTW and gloat." - 2smart4u, Aug 6 2008

"Factor in the white guilt vote and the Hillary voters and McCain may carry all 50 states." - 2smart4u, Aug 26 2008

"... they will guarantee a McCain/Palin victory. 80% of Americans will reject the angry and mean-spirited attacks and will support Palin because of them." - 2smart4u, Sep 2 2008

"Sarah Palin became VP last night, 2 months before the election. [...] Women voters will decide this election and there's no question who they'll be voting for." - 2smart4u, Sep 4 2008

"... the fact is Palin is the new rock star in this campaign and the female vote is going to make her the next VP." - 2smart4u, Sep 5 2008

"After the election in Nov. when Sarah Palin becomes V.P. ..." - 2smart4u, Sep 11 2008

"... McCain may make this election a clean sweep." - 2smart4u, Sep 16 2008

Thank you for posting the textual priors of that buffoon. How Tooby can be so self-embarassing in his assertions and yet remain relentless in casting them is an example why the republican (lower case intended) party is a blight upon modern America. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
The annointed one has now appointed 21 Czars to oversee various areas of government. The danger here is the Czars report to the President and are not subject to Congressional oversight. And wonder of wonders, there is no outrage from the Defeatocratic Congress or the NY Slimes (or any of the far left media).

Obama is slowly but surely turning the U.S. into a European style socialist country. He has already put our next 3 generations heavily in debt and he's only been in office 6 months and now he's creating a secret government with his personal Czars.

On a positive note, in 3.5 years the annointed one will be thrown out by clear-thinking Americans. A Republican will become President, fire the Czars and begin to reclaim America from Europe.

Hey numbnuts! How do you feel about the fact that your boy GW had 47 czars? Ok, now that you won't answer that let's move on. I don't hold that against GW either, because as we know, just as in Obama's admin these are oppointed advisory postitions. Now, let's get to the czar part. You do realize that is not,nor has it ever been an official government title don't you? It's a term that was started by the press. Nothing more ,nothing less. Every president has had czars. Spare us your false outrage,asshole!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet again, we are treated with blatant hypocrisy and propagandizing from the right. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/16/d...e_n_289465.html

Of course, the perpetually anonymous “2smart4u” will dismiss this because it comes from Huffington. If he was honest and genuinely concerned about his country, he would follow the links to examine the evidence – because after all, we can’t defend the country based on a collection of untruths. Here is a list of Bush’s 47 czars. http://www.democrats.org/a/2009/09/the_bush_czars.php

A “czar” can be merely a special assistant to the President, like Karl Rove. In fact, Karl Rove was one of Bush’s czars. Is there anything wrong with this? Of course not. If the President has the authority over the so-called czar’s jurisdiction, there’s nothing wrong with it. That is the reason many of these special assistants are not subject to Congressional approval. The President has many assistants who are not approved by the Congress.

If the right wishes to make an honest argument about this, they must outline the nature of the position and show why the appointment is unconstitutional without Congressional approval. Note also that many of Obama’s so-called czars have been approved by Congress.

Sen. Russell Feingold of Wisconsin has been cited as a liberal Democratic Senator who supposedly has criticized the President’s appointments. That is not accurate. Sen. Feingold wrote the President a letter asking him to release more information about the appointments. Here is the letter, in full text, from Sen. Feingold’s website. http://feingold.senate.gov/record.cfm?id=317970 This letter is entirely appropriate. The “roles and responsibilities” of the appointments are key. Are they “public ministers and consuls” or “officers of the United States,” or are they merely advisers to the President?

The right is not making a credible or an honest case. They are merely firing up their highly gullible base with a rallying cry. Merely calling someone a “czar” does not make a case against the appointment. It is completely dishonest for Glenn Beck to talk about "czars" without being honest about their positions and whether Congress has been consulted with respect to each.

Make sure you watch the youtube video scrolling down on the Huffington Post article. All the “czars” that appear on the screen were appointed by Bush.

I wonder why KOTW did not merge the two "czar" topics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 2smart4u
Hey numbnuts! How do you feel about the fact that your boy GW had 47 czars? Ok, now that you won't answer that let's move on. I don't hold that against GW either, because as we know, just as in Obama's admin these are oppointed advisory postitions. Now, let's get to the czar part. You do realize that is not,nor has it ever been an official government title don't you? It's a term that was started by the press. Nothing more ,nothing less. Every president has had czars. Spare us your false outrage,asshole!

Poor attempt at spinning. That number was the total over 8 years, most were there for a short time for advisory purposes. The total at any given time was 8 or 9. Obama's Czars however are permanent supervisory positions and are a collection of radical Loonies (Van Jones as example) with some very

disturbing backgrounds.

Go back to huffington and try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm humbled by your devotion to me, I'll send you my autograph.

That's all you have???? You're pathetic. Your predictions prove that you're no Nostradamus.

Why don't you answer people's questions? What do you think about Bush's czars? He had more than 40.

ANSWER the questions, please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor attempt at spinning. That number was the total over 8 years, most were there for a short time for advisory purposes. The total at any given time was 8 or 9. Obama's Czars however are permanent supervisory positions and are a collection of radical Loonies (Van Jones as example) with some very

disturbing backgrounds.

Go back to huffington and try again.

The thing is, man, you claims these czars are some sort of "secret... unelected" operatives. So what does this say about Bush? Was he a Nazi too? Does the number he had "at one time" matter? Here's the list, people. And I was linked by Huffingtonpost.com. F**K YOU if that's a problem. http://www.democrats.org/a/2009/09/the_bush_czars.php REPUBLICAN TALKING POINTS ALWAYS BITE THEM IN THE ASS. Get back to your TV, D**bA**.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor attempt at spinning. That number was the total over 8 years, most were there for a short time for advisory purposes. The total at any given time was 8 or 9. Obama's Czars however are permanent supervisory positions and are a collection of radical Loonies (Van Jones as example) with some very

disturbing backgrounds.

Go back to huffington and try again.

A czar is a czar. Nice try. Now, why don't you try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor attempt at spinning. That number was the total over 8 years, most were there for a short time for advisory purposes. The total at any given time was 8 or 9. Obama's Czars however are permanent supervisory positions and are a collection of radical Loonies (Van Jones as example) with some very

disturbing backgrounds.

Go back to huffington and try again.

So what? Your posts have been about the fact that Obama has czars. Does the number really matter? People are pointing out that Bush had czars as well.

You lose again.......and again......and again.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor attempt at spinning. That number was the total over 8 years, most were there for a short time for advisory purposes. The total at any given time was 8 or 9. Obama's Czars however are permanent supervisory positions and are a collection of radical Loonies (Van Jones as example) with some very

disturbing backgrounds.

Go back to huffington and try again.

Dear Idiot,

The number is not the point. What matters is whether the appointments were necessary and appropriately made. You can't analyze that just by shouting "czars!" as loudly as possible, like a little kid calling "cooties!" on a playground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...