Guest Guest Posted October 31, 2008 Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 Like Huffington post or not, that's what this former Republican Secretary of State said. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/31/e...i_n_139524.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted November 1, 2008 Report Share Posted November 1, 2008 Like Huffington post or not, that's what this former Republican Secretary of State said. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/31/e...i_n_139524.html Don't you realize all credibility is lost when Huffington Post is mentioned? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manscape Posted November 1, 2008 Report Share Posted November 1, 2008 Don't you realize all credibility is lost when Huffington Post is mentioned? Credibility is lost when Bush, Cheney, McCain or Alaskan cupcake Palin are quoted! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted November 1, 2008 Report Share Posted November 1, 2008 Don't you realize all credibility is lost when Huffington Post is mentioned? Only in the eyes of a radical right winger like you. You didn't bother to read it. That's what Eagleburger said. She's not qualified. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamK Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 Don't you realize all credibility is lost when Huffington Post is mentioned? Why? It is no secret that the Huffington Post is biased in its opinions, but it has a good record when it comes to the accuracy of its facts. If you believe otherwise, I challenge you to prove it rather than merely asserting it. That Eagleburger criticized Palin's readiness is true, and can be easily confirmed through other sources. For example: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.p...toryId=96329379 http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/newsreader/story/574206.html http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail...t_ready_to.html http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmart...in.html?showall He has since tried to recant, but his defense boils down to "she's a fast learner", coupled with a lame attempt to distract from the issue by attacking Obama, leaving his original claim of Palin's unpreparedness intact. It looks like his opinion on the subject is exactly what he said the first time, and it's only the public expression of it that he is sorry for and now regards as stupid. You can see that here: http://washingtonindependent.com/16296/eag...-a-fast-learner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 Why? It is no secret that the Huffington Post is biased in its opinions, but it has a good record when it comes to the accuracy of its facts. If you believe otherwise, I challenge you to prove it rather than merely asserting it.That Eagleburger criticized Palin's readiness is true, and can be easily confirmed through other sources. For example: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.p...toryId=96329379 http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/newsreader/story/574206.html http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail...t_ready_to.html http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmart...in.html?showall He has since tried to recant, but his defense boils down to "she's a fast learner", coupled with a lame attempt to distract from the issue by attacking Obama, leaving his original claim of Palin's unpreparedness intact. It looks like his opinion on the subject is exactly what he said the first time, and it's only the public expression of it that he is sorry for and now regards as stupid. You can see that here: http://washingtonindependent.com/16296/eag...-a-fast-learner Biased in it's opinions but accurate with the facts? Please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Paul Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 Biased in it's opinions but accurate with the facts? Please. Please what? The quote is accurate. Don't you right wingers care about reality or truth at all? You don't seem to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamK Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 Why? It is no secret that the Huffington Post is biased in its opinions, but it has a good record when it comes to the accuracy of its facts. If you believe otherwise, I challenge you to prove it rather than merely asserting it. Biased in it's opinions but accurate with the facts? Please. It looks like Guest isn't up to the challenge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.