Jump to content

What Does Anarchy Mean To You?


Guest A is for Anarchy!
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest FlagMann.
What are you opinions about anarchy. What does it mean to you? It is more then just a song..........

I know what it means to "I" :o

The U.S.A. Is breaking its own laws!!!!!!! Shame on President Bush!!!

Here comes Trash, Illegals illegals, illegals, and more illegal trash!!!

FlagMann.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't vote for bush the oil hungry sleeze bucket dictator.....so dont blame me....

Articles of Impeachment

of

President George W. Bush

and

Vice President Richard B. Cheney,

Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and

Attorney General John David Ashcroft

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from

Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and

Misdemeanors. - - ARTICLE II, SECTION 4 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald H.

Rumsfeld, and Attorney General John David Ashcroft have committed violations and

subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with

impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights

of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial

executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the Judiciary and those

reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:

1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law;

carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting

in the death and maiming of tens of thousands of Iraqis, and hundreds of U.S. G.I.s.

2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.

3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and

locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.

4) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its

government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.

4) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret

and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of

prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and

individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents

elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments

to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

5) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign

governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media

and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public

discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain

weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to

U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.

6) Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a

part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an

attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and

threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United

Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting

treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy

any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate the

exercise of U.S. military and economic power against the international community.

7) Acting to strip United States citizens of their constitutional and human rights, ordering

indefinite detention of citizens, without access to counsel, without charge, and without

opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, based solely on the

discretionary designation by the Executive of a citizen as an "enemy combatant."

8) Ordering indefinite detention of non-citizens in the United States and elsewhere, and without

charge, at the discretionary designation of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Defense.

9) Ordering and authorizing the Attorney General to override judicial orders of release of

detainees under INS jurisdiction, even where the judicial officer after full hearing determines a

detainee is wrongfully held by the government.

10) Authorizing secret military tribunals and summary execution of persons who are not citizens

who are designated solely at the discretion of the Executive who acts as indicting official,

prosecutor and as the only avenue of appellate relief.

11) Refusing to provide public disclosure of the identities and locations of persons who have

been arrested, detained and imprisoned by the U.S. government in the United States, including in

response to Congressional inquiry.

12) Use of secret arrests of persons within the United States and elsewhere and denial of the right

to public trials.

13) Authorizing the monitoring of confidential attorney-client privileged communications by the

government, even in the absence of a court order and even where an incarcerated person has not

been charged with a crime.

14) Ordering and authorizing the seizure of assets of persons in the United States, prior to

hearing or trial, for lawful or innocent association with any entity that at the discretionary

designation of the Executive has been deemed "terrorist."

15) Institutionalization of racial and religious profiling and authorization of domestic spying by

federal law enforcement on persons based on their engagement in noncriminal religious and

political activity.

16) Refusal to provide information and records necessary and appropriate for the constitutional

right of legislative oversight of executive functions.

17) Rejecting treaties protective of peace and human rights and abrogation of the obligations of

the United States under, and withdrawal from, international treaties and obligations without

consent of the legislative branch, and including termination of the ABM treaty between the

United States and Russia, and rescission of the authorizing signature from the Treaty of Rome

which served as the basis for the International Criminal Court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:o I didn't vote for bush the oil hungry sleeze bucket dictator.....so dont blame me....

Articles of Impeachment

of

President George W. Bush

and

Vice President Richard B. Cheney,

Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and

Attorney General John David Ashcroft

TO AKearnyObserver

YOU ARE A "A HOLE" YOU SHOULD LEAVE IF YOU DONT LIKE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (pube @ Jan 9 2004, 04:47 PM)

anarchy is the stupidest idea ever conceived.

Kind of like the dukenet website, being the stupidest idea ever conceived.

I disagree. Heyduke.net is not the stupidest idea ever. I would suggest that you don't talk about things you don't understand. But then again that is you opinion. You don't like HeyDuke.net don't go there. You have never been forced to go there, it has always been your choice.

As for anarchy: I have yet to see real anarchy anywhere, so I am unable to comment about it. But for what it is worth, the idea of real anarchy would never work. At least not with most people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AKearnyObserverHater

I must say that there are a few real bad apples in this bunch and A Kearny Observer just took over the lead in front of flagman. I think that you are anti-American, unpatriotic and you truly don't deserve to live in this beloved country. :o

Most likely you feel sorry for Sadaam and the way our country is treating him and also beleive that Osama is innocent until proven guilty right?

I hope you rot!!!! :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anarchy is the stupidest idea ever conceived.

:o Kind of like the dukenet website, being the stupidest idea ever conceived

heyduke is a comical site. how it is stupider than the proposition of a world with no order is beyond me. somebody's a little too "PUNK RAWK" apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest A is for Anarchy!
anarchy is the stupidest idea ever conceived.

:D Kind of like the dukenet website, being the stupidest idea ever conceived

heyduke is a comical site. how it is stupider than the proposition of a world with no order is beyond me. somebody's a little too "PUNK RAWK" apparently.

Hey i think you have pube in your mouth, or is that too rawk for you? :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must say that there are a few real bad apples in this bunch and A Kearny Observer just took over the lead in front of flagman. I think that you are anti-American, unpatriotic and you truly don't deserve to live in this beloved country. :D

Most likely you feel sorry for Sadaam and the way our country is treating him and also beleive that Osama is innocent until proven guilty right?

I hope you rot!!!! :ph34r:

Nope Im just not a republican. And your comments about sadomic and queersama

are lame. The article of impeachment I posted was written up by Ramsy Clark.

if you don't believe me goto www.votetoimpeach.org "I think that you are anti-American, unpatriotic" Maybe unpatriotic but not anti american I support the u.s.a in every bad decsion it makes :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anarchy is the stupidest idea ever conceived.

:D Kind of like the dukenet website, being the stupidest idea ever conceived

heyduke is a comical site. how it is stupider than the proposition of a world with no order is beyond me. somebody's a little too "PUNK RAWK" apparently.

Hey i think you have pube in your mouth, or is that too rawk for you? :ph34r:

let's be honest.. how old are you? 11, 12? Log off your computer and let the big people talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anarchy is the stupidest idea ever conceived.

:D Kind of like the dukenet website, being the stupidest idea ever conceived

heyduke is a comical site. how it is stupider than the proposition of a world with no order is beyond me. somebody's a little too "PUNK RAWK" apparently.

Hey i think you have pube in your mouth, or is that too rawk for you? :ph34r:

let's be honest.. how old are you? 11, 12? Log off your computer and let the big people talk.

omg lmao...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Paul Revere
This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.

The Redcoats are coming!

The Redcoats are coming!

Get a clue Kearny Observer :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.

That won't be anytime soon. Its not easy to amend the existing government, nor overthrow it, when they hold all the cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gettin' Older
This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.

That won't be anytime soon. Its not easy to amend the existing government, nor overthrow it, when they hold all the cards.

We are supposed to live in a repulic which is governed BY THE PEOPLE, THROUGH DEMOCRATICALLY elected officials, so:

Step #1. Do away with the Electoral College!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.

That won't be anytime soon. Its not easy to amend the existing government, nor overthrow it, when they hold all the cards.

We are supposed to live in a repulic which is governed BY THE PEOPLE, THROUGH DEMOCRATICALLY elected officials, so:

Step #1. Do away with the Electoral College!

Step #2 Get rid of affirmative action

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Studies and Observations
We are supposed to live in a repulic which is governed BY THE PEOPLE, THROUGH DEMOCRATICALLY elected officials, so:

Step #1. Do away with the Electoral College!

Since the Electoral College is a part of the Constitution, THAT would take a change there, and once you call a Constitutional Convention, EVERYTHING is up for grabs.....The First Ammendment is under constant attack, as is the Second (Nowhere moreso than here in NJ), by Judges who chose to legislate through Decision, rather than work within the bounds of legislation. The Electoral College exists so that states like Rhode Island, or North Dakota actually HAVE a say in who gets elected president, rather than the Presidency being in the hands of the Population Centers. The founding Fathers though enough of this even Then in the 18th Century to Include the college in the Constitution...Dont be so quick to throw it away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gettin' Older
We are supposed to live in a repulic which is governed BY THE PEOPLE, THROUGH DEMOCRATICALLY elected officials, so:

Step #1. Do away with the Electoral College!

Since the Electoral College is a part of the Constitution, THAT would take a change there, and once you call a Constitutional Convention, EVERYTHING is up for grabs.....The First Ammendment is under constant attack, as is the Second (Nowhere moreso than here in NJ), by Judges who chose to legislate through Decision, rather than work within the bounds of legislation. The Electoral College exists so that states like Rhode Island, or North Dakota actually HAVE a say in who gets elected president, rather than the Presidency being in the hands of the Population Centers. The founding Fathers though enough of this even Then in the 18th Century to Include the college in the Constitution...Dont be so quick to throw it away.

I'll concede that (especially at present) the idea of a Constitutional Convention is not appealing, and honestly, no, I'm not calling for it. My opinion remains though, that the Electoral College is is not the way to elect a president.

States no longer possess near the level of individuality, or desire of separation that the original colonies did. (exceptions noted) Part of the reason for this is because of the huge increase in the flux of the individuals who make up this country, including the population centers. If the Electoral College is still relevant, then shouldn't state level elections work the same way? (i.e., The number of votes from New York City put in balance with those from Jamestown when electing a governor)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...