Guest Guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 PatRat just opened a topic to accuse the New York Times of censorship. His argument was thoroughly trounced. Didn't matter to him one bit. He just opened another topic. If you check the number of topics at KOTW, most of them were opened by this one whack job under one of his sock puppet names: PatRat/2Stupid4Words/BushWhacker/etc. Trolls love attention. So let's talk about the fool. Either that or let's all just ignore him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 PatRat just opened a topic to accuse the New York Times of censorship. His argument was thoroughly trounced. Didn't matter to him one bit. He just opened another topic. If you check the number of topics at KOTW, most of them were opened by this one whack job under one of his sock puppet names: PatRat/2Stupid4Words/BushWhacker/etc. Trolls love attention. So let's talk about the fool. Either that or let's all just ignore him. In this thread we should make a list of the sockpuppets so that anyone can see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 PatRat just opened a topic to accuse the New York Times of censorship. His argument was thoroughly trounced. Didn't matter to him one bit. He just opened another topic. If you check the number of topics at KOTW, most of them were opened by this one whack job under one of his sock puppet names: PatRat/2Stupid4Words/BushWhacker/etc. Trolls love attention. So let's talk about the fool. Either that or let's all just ignore him. There are some KOTW readers that enjoy reading his posts and actually agree with many of them. I am a republican who's supports George Bush, I believe many of our problems are because we have a do-nothing Democratic congress that's more concerned with fighting with Bush than accomplishing anything. I also can't believe all the readers that think the NY Times did the right thing by refusing McCains op-ed piece after printing Obama's article. That's dispicable conduct for a national newspaper that should be showing both sides of an issue. But I suppose that's the reason why they're in financial trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.