Jump to content

Confused in VA

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Confused in VA

  1. Excellent! I know that it took months to get to this point and I am sure there were many heated discussions across the US because of this topic (KOTW included), but I am glad that both sides supported the other in the end. Life is a learning experience and sometimes it takes a situation like this to get everything back on track.

    I'm glad that both sides were able to find middle ground-

  2. I think that it's important that all of the above come out and state their views on the LaClair matter publicly.

    I don't believe that current BOE members can publically speak about how they may feel about the issue. I also think its intersting that you suggest they publically state how they feel, when you are not a registered user. What is your stance on the issue Guest?

  3. Any changes of schedule due to weather will be posted here and the KHS web-site, www.kearnyschools.com

    KHS

    Break legs this weekend! I hope the weather holds up for you! I heard the dress rehearsal with the seniors was thoroughly enjoyed by all. Well done folks!

  4. What it is about is ethics.  It is about Paul LaClair standing in front of the community and shouting more than once that his rights have been violated for a teacher discussing religion in class and taking scholarship from an Atheist Association hiding behind the name of Thomas Jefferson and sending his other child to a religious university that has given his family scholarship funds.

    I for the life of me cannot see how that is not ethical?  And you wish me to call this family patriotic? A parent does foster and guide the child in these cases and it seems irresponsible how if the family's beliefs are that strong that they would let that child attend.  Perhaps there are other ulterior motives that are not being shared?

    Guest, I never suggested you call the family patriotic or unpatriotic. I never suggested that it was ethical or not ethical. I apologize if you thought that was what I was suggesting. I was simply trying to point out that this issue is about an issue in public school classroom with a particular person, not about religion in general. I was also trying to illustrate that a sibling's college decision has no bearing on this thread.

    What if the sibling fought to attend this college against the parent's wishes? What if the sibling was a devout Methodist and only applied to UMC schools? What if the family suggested the sibling attend this specific college because of programs of study offered? I raise these questions since I went through a similar process when I choose to attend a Jesuit affiliated college for its science and athletic programs. I am not saying that the sibling went through those actions, but why attack a subject with no background? Why not ask the question instead of attack?

    It appears that many of the threads are accusations, finger pointing and quotes, which is why I have not posted much. I believe that all sides have participated in fueling the fire creating the heated discussions on the board today. The one thing that does bother me about this particular thread is that it appears you are involving a sibling/college student who has not weighed in on this issue at all. We do not know how the sibling ended up attending a religiously oriented school nor what the sibling’s personal beliefs are, yet we have not problem throwing them into the mix. If the question is to the parents, then ask it and I am sure that a response will be provided.

  5. Shame how the LaClairs can criticize one their children’s teacher and making a mock of the town they live in for mentioning religion in class, but somehow its ok for their other child takes the scholarship money (nearly a full scholarship) for attending a college in New Jersey whose affiliation is with the United Methodist Church.

    Shame on the LaClairs.

    With all due respect Guest. I'm not sure I follow your thought. I may or may not agree with the approach of the situation by the LaClairs, but they have been very clear that this is not an attack on religion, but an issue with where the conversations took place and the person involved in the conversation. Where siblings choose to go to school is of no relevance to this discussion.

    I fully support debate and thought-provoking conversation, but I cannot tolerate a sibling being pulled into this situation, nor the suggestion that the parents pushed their child to attend a religiously affiliated school due to money. Truth be told, if a child is offered "nearly a full scholarship" chances are that similar offers were also available from other schools.

    Honestly- does it matter? Why overtly insinuate that the LaClairs are anti-religion? Why involved a sibling in this discussion?

  6. Where is the harm to the students when their voices are anonymous to the world?

    Paul, I am not sure how to best respond to your question. Anonymity is relative.

    I am sure that if I walked the halls of Kearny High School (KHS) I would know exactly who said what on that tape. The students may be anonymous to someone in a different place, but the students in that class are exposed in that school. Are you aware if any of the students raised this concern to the BOE or administration?

    In my original post above I was just trying to understand if the BOE policy was put in place in order to protect teachers from this very situation or to protect the students. It is not necessarily about anonymity, it is about fostering a safe environment so a student can learn. Since the tapings became public I wonder if the amount of class participation has dropped at KHS.

×
×
  • Create New...