Guest 2smart4u Posted March 24, 2015 Report Share Posted March 24, 2015 I have to jump in here. Did you just land on this planet ? Have you noticed that half the world is on fire? Iran is taking over the Mideast while laughing at Obama's silly attempts to negotiate with them. We just evacuated Yemen. Even the Dems in Congress are turning against him. Wise up. ZerO not long ago touted Yemen as a model of a well run country. Well that was the kiss of death for Yemen. Todays news has videos of Yemen on fire; rioting, burning, looting and shootings. The government has been overthrown and Iran is behind it. You remember Iran, that's the country zerO is trying to be friends with, while they chant death to Israel and America. Oh yeah, zerO has an excellent foreign policy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 25, 2015 Report Share Posted March 25, 2015 She didn't. The White House briefed her and accompanied her on that trip. Her intent was not to undermine the administration's policies. She was acting with the Bush administration, not against it. Intent is a requirement under the Logan Act. Read it instead of parroting back whatever Fox and Limbaugh tell you to think. actually i got THAT from one of YOUR people..Jon Stewart who i have to respect somewhat because even HE sees the Hypocrisy in this Bullshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 27, 2015 Report Share Posted March 27, 2015 actually i got THAT from one of YOUR people..Jon Stewart who i have to respect somewhat because even HE sees the Hypocrisy in this Bullshit. Don't go to secondary sources, and don't expect us to take your interpretation of Jon Stewart's excellent humor-news program at face value. Maybe you're fair, objective and independent; or maybe you're like Joe the Plumber who claimed to be an independent but in fact is a flaming right winger. Doesn't matter. Examine the facts. The White House briefed Clinton, administration officials went with her on the trip, and she did not attempt to undermine American foreign policy. If you have different facts, then provide links from real news sources. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 Don't go to secondary sources, and don't expect us to take your interpretation of Jon Stewart's excellent humor-news program at face value. Maybe you're fair, objective and independent; or maybe you're like Joe the Plumber who claimed to be an independent but in fact is a flaming right winger. Doesn't matter. Examine the facts. The White House briefed Clinton, administration officials went with her on the trip, and she did not attempt to undermine American foreign policy. If you have different facts, then provide links from real news sources. So you think she couldn't send or receive secret e-mails on her private cell phone in the privacy of her bedroom at night ? Wise up dummy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Don't go to secondary sources, and don't expect us to take your interpretation of Jon Stewart's excellent humor-news program at face value. Maybe you're fair, objective and independent; or maybe you're like Joe the Plumber who claimed to be an independent but in fact is a flaming right winger. Doesn't matter. Examine the facts. The White House briefed Clinton, administration officials went with her on the trip, and she did not attempt to undermine American foreign policy. If you have different facts, then provide links from real news sources. The White House briefed Clinton but not Pelosi. Pelosi did go against the Bush Administration's wishes. However, nothing she did violated the Logan Act. The recent letter by the 47 Republicans did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 So you think she couldn't send or receive secret e-mails on her private cell phone in the privacy of her bedroom at night ? Wise up dummy. Any public official could do that. Any public official, Democrat or Republican, could also have a private meeting, unrecorded, and no one would ever have any way to know what happened. So why not have every high public official carry a live wire at all times, so we know exactly what they do and say at every moment? The reason we don't do that is that some things the President and the Secretary of State say are so sensitive that making them public would compromise our national security. But if Hilary Clinton has any communication that isn't fully recorded and disclosed to the world, you right-wing nut-cakes go crazy and try to invent an issue out of it. You wouldn't treat a Republican that way, and if anyone did, you would accuse them of treason. These high offices are positions of trust. There has to be a balance between transparency and naivete. Your motives are transparent, as is your hatred and contempt for Obama, Clinton and any Democrat who is in any position of power. This is a non-issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted March 30, 2015 Report Share Posted March 30, 2015 Any public official could do that. Any public official, Democrat or Republican, could also have a private meeting, unrecorded, and no one would ever have any way to know what happened. So why not have every high public official carry a live wire at all times, so we know exactly what they do and say at every moment? The reason we don't do that is that some things the President and the Secretary of State say are so sensitive that making them public would compromise our national security. But if Hilary Clinton has any communication that isn't fully recorded and disclosed to the world, you right-wing nut-cakes go crazy and try to invent an issue out of it. You wouldn't treat a Republican that way, and if anyone did, you would accuse them of treason. These high offices are positions of trust. There has to be a balance between transparency and naivete. Your motives are transparent, as is your hatred and contempt for Obama, Clinton and any Democrat who is in any position of power. This is a non-issue. You can't use the word "trust" and Hillary Clinton in the same sentence. Bubba thought he was above the law as does the Ice Queen. Hillary will have to testify before Congress and her lies and illegal activities will be exposed. Her poll numbers have dropped 20 points and by the time Congress is done with her she'll be unelectable. Don't look for zerO to stand by her, there's no love lost there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Get serious Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 Senate Republicans wrote and signed a letter to the government of Iran, interfering with the president's negotiations on a sensitive matter in dispute between Iran and the United States. In 1799, Congress passed and President John Adams signed the Logan Act, under which the 47 Republican traitors' political stunt is a felony, punishable by a fine and up to three years imprisonment. There's nothing to investigate. The letter speaks for itself, and those who signed it have essentially confessed to the crime. The language of the law is entirely clear: "Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." Under our law, the executive, not the Congress, conducts negotiations with foreign governments. These 47 political hacks have committed a crime. The Justice Department should prosecute them, and send a message that American diplomacy is not a forum for political stunts by little boys and little girls who care about playing to their right wing base more than they care about the security of the American people. Hiperbole at it's finest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted March 31, 2015 Report Share Posted March 31, 2015 Any public official could do that. Any public official, Democrat or Republican, could also have a private meeting, unrecorded, and no one would ever have any way to know what happened. So why not have every high public official carry a live wire at all times, so we know exactly what they do and say at every moment? The reason we don't do that is that some things the President and the Secretary of State say are so sensitive that making them public would compromise our national security. But if Hilary Clinton has any communication that isn't fully recorded and disclosed to the world, you right-wing nut-cakes go crazy and try to invent an issue out of it. You wouldn't treat a Republican that way, and if anyone did, you would accuse them of treason. These high offices are positions of trust. There has to be a balance between transparency and naivete. Your motives are transparent, as is your hatred and contempt for Obama, Clinton and any Democrat who is in any position of power. This is a non-issue. Too much transparency would shut down international negotiations completely. No one conducts negotiations like that. 2dim is the last person who should be barking at anyone else to "wise up." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted April 1, 2015 Report Share Posted April 1, 2015 You can't use the word "trust" and Hillary Clinton in the same sentence. Bubba thought he was above the law as does the Ice Queen. Hillary will have to testify before Congress and her lies and illegal activities will be exposed. Her poll numbers have dropped 20 points and by the time Congress is done with her she'll be unelectable. Don't look for zerO to stand by her, there's no love lost there. Whatever you say, President Giuliani. By the way, the man you call "Bubba" served two terms as President of the United States. If he could run again today, he would win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted April 2, 2015 Report Share Posted April 2, 2015 Whatever you say, President Giuliani. By the way, the man you call "Bubba" served two terms as President of the United States. If he could run again today, he would win. Bubba is the nicest name I could call him. He has the morals of an alley cat. But of course, being married to the Ice Queen I can understand his need to sodomize interns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted April 5, 2015 Report Share Posted April 5, 2015 As usual, 2Stupid4Words changes the subject because he has no answers. The fact remains, 47 Republican Senators have violated the Logan Act. They should be prosecuted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted April 7, 2015 Report Share Posted April 7, 2015 As usual, 2Stupid4Words changes the subject because he has no answers. The fact remains, 47 Republican Senators have violated the Logan Act. They should be prosecuted. Keep me posted. Let me know when that happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted April 8, 2015 Report Share Posted April 8, 2015 Keep me posted. Let me know when that happens. Didn't say it will happen. It should happen. They broke the law and undermined American foreign policy. If Democrats did that to a Republican president, you would call them traitors and demand that they be tried for treason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted April 12, 2015 Report Share Posted April 12, 2015 Didn't say it will happen. It should happen. They broke the law and undermined American foreign policy. If Democrats did that to a Republican president, you would call them traitors and demand that they be tried for treason. "broke the law and undermined American foreign policy". You're talking about zerO. Why don't you think he should be tried for treason? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted April 14, 2015 Report Share Posted April 14, 2015 "broke the law and undermined American foreign policy". You're talking about zerO. Why don't you think he should be tried for treason? Because he didn't break the law. 47 Republicans broke the Logan Act. What law do you claim President Obama broke, for which there is a criminal penalty? We'll wait with baited breath for your cogent analysis. Problem is, you don't have a cogent analysis. Because you're an idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.