Guest 2smart4u Posted May 14, 2010 Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 The USA, with Comrade zerO at the helm is racing toward breaking 13 trillion in the nation's debt in a matter of days. The question here is can the US survive until the Nov. elections when the GOP takes over and cuts up Comrade zerO's credit cards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 15, 2010 Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 The USA, with Comrade zerO at the helm is racing toward breaking 13 trillion in the nation's debt in a matter of days. The question here is can the US survive until the Nov. elections when the GOP takes over and cuts up Comrade zerO's credit cards. Idiot, The spin is meaningless. Here are the facts. http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports...debt_histo5.htm Your hero Bush doubled the debt when we didn’t need to. If Monkey Boy hadn’t given our money away to the rich, we would have had a cushion to use when Bush’s meltdown hit and made it necessary for us to spend money to stimulate the economy. That’s why it’s called a stimulus package, stupid. Now look at these numbers, stupid. http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports...debt_histo3.htm Look at that, the debt doubled in just one year, from 1942 to 1943! Must be that spendocrat FDR, right? Wrong, stupid. We were spending money on World War II, you know, the one we fought so the country could survive. We’re running up debt to save the country from Junior having run it into the ditch with two unfunded wars, a huge tax giveaway to the rich and a near meltdown of the economy on his watch. You neglect to mention those three inconvenient facts. Now look at these numbers, stupid. http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports...debt_histo4.htm Under Reagan and Bush I, the national debt quadrupled! Under Clinton, it rose only about 50%, and during Clinton’s final year it barely rose at all. http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports...debt_histo5.htm And how did Clinton do it? Very simple, he passed responsible tax legislation, for which he paid a very heavy political price because idiots like you can’t see past the nose on your face. “Oh my God, facts?” you say? That’s right, stupid, facts. Like the fact that Republicans talk about reducing the debt but they don’t do it. Obviously you’re too freaking stupid to notice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted May 16, 2010 Report Share Posted May 16, 2010 Idiot,The spin is meaningless. Here are the facts. http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports...debt_histo5.htm Your hero Bush doubled the debt when we didn’t need to. If Monkey Boy hadn’t given our money away to the rich, we would have had a cushion to use when Bush’s meltdown hit and made it necessary for us to spend money to stimulate the economy. That’s why it’s called a stimulus package, stupid. Now look at these numbers, stupid. http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports...debt_histo3.htm Look at that, the debt doubled in just one year, from 1942 to 1943! Must be that spendocrat FDR, right? Wrong, stupid. We were spending money on World War II, you know, the one we fought so the country could survive. We’re running up debt to save the country from Junior having run it into the ditch with two unfunded wars, a huge tax giveaway to the rich and a near meltdown of the economy on his watch. You neglect to mention those three inconvenient facts. Now look at these numbers, stupid. http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports...debt_histo4.htm Under Reagan and Bush I, the national debt quadrupled! Under Clinton, it rose only about 50%, and during Clinton’s final year it barely rose at all. http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports...debt_histo5.htm And how did Clinton do it? Very simple, he passed responsible tax legislation, for which he paid a very heavy political price because idiots like you can’t see past the nose on your face. “Oh my God, facts?” you say? That’s right, stupid, facts. Like the fact that Republicans talk about reducing the debt but they don’t do it. Obviously you’re too freaking stupid to notice. I keep forgetting, I'm glad you reminded me. It's not Comrade zerO spending all these billions and trillions, it's Bush !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 17, 2010 Report Share Posted May 17, 2010 I keep forgetting, I'm glad you reminded me. It's not Comrade zerO spending all these billions and trillions, it's Bush !! I'll put it in terms you might understand. When you get drunk, gamble away your money and run the car into a crowd of people of your way home, it's not daddy's fault that you have to spend a lot of money bailing your sorry behind out of jail and then paying for a defense lawyer so you don't end up in prison. See, the idea is that when you do stupid things, it costs a lot more money later. President Obama is investing in the country's future. If Monkey Boy had just kept us on the course Clinton had set, the debt would be half of what it is today and we wouldn't have to spend more money to keep the economy from collapsing. But Monkey Boy didn't do that. Instead, he told us that everything was peachy and we could just tax-cut and spend our way into debt. That's why people talk about him running the economy into the ditch. But what the hey, you're not listening. Those are facts. You don't care about facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted May 18, 2010 Report Share Posted May 18, 2010 I'll put it in terms you might understand. When you get drunk, gamble away your money and run the car into a crowd of people of your way home, it's not daddy's fault that you have to spend a lot of money bailing your sorry behind out of jail and then paying for a defense lawyer so you don't end up in prison. See, the idea is that when you do stupid things, it costs a lot more money later. President Obama is investing in the country's future. If Monkey Boy had just kept us on the course Clinton had set, the debt would be half of what it is today and we wouldn't have to spend more money to keep the economy from collapsing. But Monkey Boy didn't do that. Instead, he told us that everything was peachy and we could just tax-cut and spend our way into debt. That's why people talk about him running the economy into the ditch. But what the hey, you're not listening. Those are facts. You don't care about facts. "President Obama is investing in the country's future" ??? You're drunk on Kool-Aid. Your grandchildren and mine, who aren't yet born already owe the federal government over $50,000. each and that number is growing daily. The billions that Comrade zerO is spending daily will cause our grandchildren to pay higher interest rates and have fewer job prospects than we do today. Wise up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 18, 2010 Report Share Posted May 18, 2010 "President Obama is investing in the country's future" ??? You're drunk on Kool-Aid. Your grandchildren and mine, who aren't yet born already owe the federal government over $50,000. each and that number is growing daily. The billions that Comrade zerO is spending daily will cause our grandchildren to pay higher interest rates and have fewer job prospects than we do today. Wise up. Stupid, Where would this country and its people be if the major financial institutions and the auto industry had collapsed? Where would we be if we had 20% unemployment instead of just under 10%? Where would we be if the health care system had continued to function as a profit-maker for the insurance companies and little else? Those are all investments. Saving the economic system from meltdown is an investment. Any time you spend money to keep a disaster from happening, it's an investment. If you want to make any sense, you can't just keep complaining that we've spent money. You have to show that the money wasn't wisely spent. And you can't do that because it isn't so. The money was necessarily spent to save our economy. The fact that the meltdown didn't happen is to Obama's credit but all you can do is whine and complain because Giuliani didn't get in. If he or any other Republican had pulled the economy back from the cliff after a Democratic president had nearly run us off it, you'd be telling us all what a great president he was - just like you're telling us what a great president Bush was for starting a war that was completely unnecessary and passing a huge tax giveaway for billionaires. Those of us with any sense can see he was completely wrong for the job. Fact: a Democrat didn't run the economy into the ditch; Bush did that, and now President Obama is pulling it out. The mere fact that you blindly hate President Obama doesn't diminish his positive accomplishments for our country, which already are prodigious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 18, 2010 Report Share Posted May 18, 2010 "President Obama is investing in the country's future" ??? You're drunk on Kool-Aid. Your grandchildren and mine, who aren't yet born already owe the federal government over $50,000. each and that number is growing daily. The billions that Comrade zerO is spending daily will cause our grandchildren to pay higher interest rates and have fewer job prospects than we do today. Wise up. Grandchildren? That would imply that someone (possibly of the opposite even) had sex with you. I highy doubt that. Ohh good! You durg "Kool-Aid" back out. That always makes your arguement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 Stupid,Where would this country and its people be if the major financial institutions and the auto industry had collapsed? Where would we be if we had 20% unemployment instead of just under 10%? Where would we be if the health care system had continued to function as a profit-maker for the insurance companies and little else? Those are all investments. Saving the economic system from meltdown is an investment. Any time you spend money to keep a disaster from happening, it's an investment. If you want to make any sense, you can't just keep complaining that we've spent money. You have to show that the money wasn't wisely spent. And you can't do that because it isn't so. The money was necessarily spent to save our economy. The fact that the meltdown didn't happen is to Obama's credit but all you can do is whine and complain because Giuliani didn't get in. If he or any other Republican had pulled the economy back from the cliff after a Democratic president had nearly run us off it, you'd be telling us all what a great president he was - just like you're telling us what a great president Bush was for starting a war that was completely unnecessary and passing a huge tax giveaway for billionaires. Those of us with any sense can see he was completely wrong for the job. Fact: a Democrat didn't run the economy into the ditch; Bush did that, and now President Obama is pulling it out. The mere fact that you blindly hate President Obama doesn't diminish his positive accomplishments for our country, which already are prodigious. "prodigious" positive accomplishments ?? Our debt is becoming prodigious, the invasion of our southern border is becoming prodigious, the incompetence of the Comrade zerO administration is prodigious. Positive? Hardly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest *Autonomous* Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 "President Obama is investing in the country's future" ??? You're drunk on Kool-Aid. Your grandchildren and mine, who aren't yet born already owe the federal government over $50,000. each and that number is growing daily. The billions that Comrade zerO is spending daily will cause our grandchildren to pay higher interest rates and have fewer job prospects than we do today. Wise up. If I can be serious for a moment, you do realize that the term "Comrade zerO" originated from the white supremacist site Stormfront, right? Is that really a group you want to associate yourself with in every other post? It might be a good idea to do a little research into who you're ripping off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 "prodigious" positive accomplishments ?? Our debt is becoming prodigious, the invasion of our southern border is becoming prodigious, the incompetence of the Comrade zerO administration is prodigious. Positive? Hardly. Stupid, You didn't answer any of the questions. Most of the debt was accumulated by Republican presidents beginning with Reagan. That's a fact, which you conveniently ignore. Current debt is being accumulated to save the economy from collapse. That is also a fact you conveniently ignore. All of a sudden, now that a Democrat is in the White House, immigration is a worse problem than it was two years ago. No it isn't. You're just more willing to yell at the President. President Obama prevented a second Great Depression, passed a national health care bill that had eluded every president since TR and restored our international standing and respect. That is competence of the highest order. You just won't admit it. Actually, you probably can't admit it. You're so blinded with your hatred of all Democrats - as you make obvious with everything you write - that you can't see the truth. So naturally you can't admit it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted May 19, 2010 Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 If I can be serious for a moment, you do realize that the term "Comrade zerO" originated from the white supremacist site Stormfront, right? Is that really a group you want to associate yourself with in every other post? It might be a good idea to do a little research into who you're ripping off. Wrong again, Dummy. "Comrade zerO" originated at a Marxist/Leninist website: comradezero.blogspot.com. It referred to Chairman Mao of China. Hey, don't give up though. You may get something right yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest *Autonomous* Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 Wrong again, Dummy. "Comrade zerO" originated at a Marxist/Leninist website: comradezero.blogspot.com. It referred to Chairman Mao of China.Hey, don't give up though. You may get something right yet. Doyou not know how to do a google search and then sort by date, D**bA**? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 Wrong again, Dummy. "Comrade zerO" originated at a Marxist/Leninist website: comradezero.blogspot.com. It referred to Chairman Mao of China.Hey, don't give up though. You may get something right yet. The autonomous ignoramus wouldn't know this working in a motor pool, but Chairman O and Comrade O date back to WW2. I learned this in OCS years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Keith Posted May 20, 2010 Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 The autonomous ignoramus wouldn't know this working in a motor pool, but Chairman O and Comrade O date back to WW2. I learned this in OCS years ago. OCS my ass! BTW, why did you quit posting under "Patriot?" Was it because everyone knew it was you? The exasperating 2smart 4 no one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 OCS my ass! BTW, why did you quit posting under "Patriot?" Was it because everyone knew it was you?The exasperating 2smart 4 no one? Just curious, who is this idiot "2stupid4words"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 Just curious, who is this idiot "2stupid4words"? It's Michelle Obama's pet name for her incompetent socialist husband, otherwise known as Comrade zerO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest *Autonomous* Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 The autonomous ignoramus wouldn't know this working in a motor pool, but Chairman O and Comrade O date back to WW2. I learned this in OCS years ago. Of course they do. But in modern useage a racist group started calling a black president by the term and you're imitating them. Not to mention-if you actually think that Obama's a Marxist you're a loon. There you go insulting the military again. I've known some incredibly brave men and women in the motor pool. Shame on you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted May 22, 2010 Report Share Posted May 22, 2010 Of course they do. But in modern useage a racist group started calling a black president by the term and you're imitating them. Not to mention-if you actually think that Obama's a Marxist you're a loon.There you go insulting the military again. I've known some incredibly brave men and women in the motor pool. Shame on you. You're back-peddling. What happened to checking dates with Google? Do I think Comrade zerO is a Marxist ? ABSOLUTELY !!! What else would you call a re-distribution of wealth, taxing the rich to give to the poor and a government run nanny state. Marxism ! FYI, I'm sure I donate more to the Wounded Warriors and the USO than you. My insults of you don't include the military, I'm a vet and proud of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 22, 2010 Report Share Posted May 22, 2010 You're back-peddling. What happened to checking dates with Google? Do I think Comrade zerO is a Marxist ? ABSOLUTELY !!! What else would you call a re-distribution of wealth, taxing the rich to give to the poor and a government run nanny state. Marxism !FYI, I'm sure I donate more to the Wounded Warriors and the USO than you. My insults of you don't include the military, I'm a vet and proud of it. Why didn't you complain about redistribution of wealth when the Republicans gave the middle class' money away to the rich? You see, Stupid, a theoretical opportunity to make money is not enough any more. If income is too highly concentrated among a few, the middle class and the poor don't have a chance. During the Reagan era, the middle class fell behind while the rich got super-rich. Instead of making a good living off one income, like Americans did from the late 40s into the 70s, Americans now struggle to make ends meet with two incomes. It's a game, Stupid. The rich control it, and they rig it so they win. Are you too freaking stupid to notice what has happened? Yes, obviously you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 22, 2010 Report Share Posted May 22, 2010 You're back-peddling. What happened to checking dates with Google? Do I think Comrade zerO is a Marxist ? ABSOLUTELY !!! What else would you call a re-distribution of wealth, taxing the rich to give to the poor and a government run nanny state. Marxism !FYI, I'm sure I donate more to the Wounded Warriors and the USO than you. My insults of you don't include the military, I'm a vet and proud of it. There you go again. You are a hate America buffoon that never served despite your claims. OCS to you, stands for Official Communist Supporter. Go away maggot before you get charged under the stolen valor act. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted May 23, 2010 Report Share Posted May 23, 2010 There you go again. You are a hate America buffoon that never served despite your claims. OCS to you, stands for Official Communist Supporter.Go away maggot before you get charged under the stolen valor act. I was a Marine Lt., a veteran who received an honorable discharge, votes Republican, flies an American flag in front of my house, donates to Wounded Warriors, USO and the GOP and drive American - made cars. Now besides getting a tingle up your leg at the sight of Comrade zerO, what makes you a rambo-type, cupcake?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 I was a Marine Lt., a veteran who received an honorable discharge, votes Republican, flies an American flag in front of my house, donates to Wounded Warriors, USO and the GOP and drive American - made cars. Now besides getting a tingle up your leg at the sight of Comrade zerO, what makes you a rambo-type, cupcake?? I've known real marines and they didn't act like you. This is not how they teach people to behave in the Marine Corps. If you were a Marine, it was a long time ago and you have become a disgrace to one of the most honorable institutions in the world. Shame on you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 I was a Marine Lt., a veteran who received an honorable discharge, votes Republican, flies an American flag in front of my house, donates to Wounded Warriors, USO and the GOP and drive American - made cars. Now besides getting a tingle up your leg at the sight of Comrade zerO, what makes you a rambo-type, cupcake?? Beats the euphoria you get from drug using limbaugh's nazi musings. Army mustang, retiring as an O-5, March 1,2009 with 33 years of honorable service. 80% VA award for injuries from an IED attack in 2008. You say you were a Lt which would give you 2-4 of service. Your extensive experience shows. Now stay in your paygrade nugget. As a retiree I earned the right to use my rank, if you truly served and support the military it's Sir to you. You know, that whole company grade versus field grade officers. You are dismissed mister. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 2smart4u Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 Beats the euphoria you get from drug using limbaugh's nazi musings. Army mustang, retiring as an O-5, March 1,2009 with 33 years of honorable service. 80% VA award for injuries from an IED attack in 2008. You say you were a Lt which would give you 2-4 of service. Your extensive experience shows. Now stay in your paygrade nugget. As a retiree I earned the right to use my rank, if you truly served and support the military it's Sir to you. You know, that whole company grade versus field grade officers. You are dismissed mister. Incoherent nonsense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 Incoherent nonsense. Shameless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.