Guest dogretired Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 At the town meeting of February 2, Steve McCormick raised the question of bills submitted before the permits were issued for the boiler at the firehouse. Work was supposedly started in September and according to Mr. Catrambone it will be completed in three more days. Mr Catrambone also stated that a licensed plumber was not needed to install gas piping. Does this apply only to Harrison in-house plumbing work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlueTideBacker Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 At the town meeting of February 2, Steve McCormick raised the question of bills submitted before the permits were issued for the boiler at the firehouse. Work was supposedly started in September and according to Mr. Catrambone it will be completed in three more days. Mr Catrambone also stated that a licensed plumber was not needed to install gas piping. Does this apply only to Harrison in-house plumbing work? Installing gas piping by someone not licensed to do that kind of work?? Sure glad it's not my house. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2010 Report Share Posted February 3, 2010 At the town meeting of February 2, Steve McCormick raised the question of bills submitted before the permits were issued for the boiler at the firehouse. Work was supposedly started in September and according to Mr. Catrambone it will be completed in three more days. Mr Catrambone also stated that a licensed plumber was not needed to install gas piping. Does this apply only to Harrison in-house plumbing work? SEND THE MAYOR! There is finally a job he may be qualified to do!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 was there an air test on the gas line? Who is the licensed plumber who hooked up the water to the boiler? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WITCH HAZEL Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 At the town meeting of February 2, Steve McCormick raised the question of bills submitted before the permits were issued for the boiler at the firehouse. Work was supposedly started in September and according to Mr. Catrambone it will be completed in three more days. Mr Catrambone also stated that a licensed plumber was not needed to install gas piping. Does this apply only to Harrison in-house plumbing work? mc comic should know this already ..HE DID IT TOO. $$$$$ did he begin to pay those costly fines yet $$$$$ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 mc comic should know this already ..HE DID IT TOO.$$$$$ did he begin to pay those costly fines yet $$$$$ I heard they decided not to pay the fines until the town collects the $100,000 in quarters and until the bagman leaves his secret job. I don't blame them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Airwarrior Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 I heard they decided not to pay the fines until the town collects the $100,000 in quarters and until the bagman leaves his secret job. I don't blame them. So they're just more of the same? Others get away with it so will we? They are as bankrupt morally as they are financially. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 I heard they decided not to pay the fines until the town collects the $100,000 in quarters and until the bagman leaves his secret job. I don't blame them. Nobody blames them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest T.THE BAGMAN Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 I heard they decided not to pay the fines until the town collects the $100,000 in quarters and until the bagman leaves his secret job. I don't blame them. YEAH. MCCOMIC $1.00 A YEAR FOR THE NEXT 15,000 YEARS QUATERS- $1.00 A YEAR FOR THE NEXT 100,000 YEARS BUT THE BAGMAN IS FOREVER. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest piper Posted February 4, 2010 Report Share Posted February 4, 2010 Installing gas piping by someone not licensed to do that kind of work?? Sure glad it's not my house. plumbing permits are only required when you connect to water or sanitary systems, gas piping is not plumbing by nature , any one with a permit can connect gas piping with the proper permits and can show that he or she has knowledge of it'sproper installation. public service installs gas piping and they are not required to be licensed plumbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 plumbing permits are only required when you connect to water or sanitary systems, gas piping is not plumbing by nature , any one with a permit can connect gas piping with the proper permits and can show that he or she has knowledge of it'sproper installation. public service installs gas piping and they are not required to be licensed plumbers. well you're just plain stooopid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Erudition Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 So they're just more of the same? Others get away with it so will we? They are as bankrupt morally as they are financially. bankrupt morally Come on now?! I assume they worked it out, agreed to terms that were mutually acceptable and payment is forthcoming. Besides, you would have them run right down and eagerly pay fines that were levied by a governing body that arbitrarily chooses to impose a fine or not. The same applys to the amount of that fine. I am not aware of all the particulars involved but I do know of similar instances where the accused violater was more of a friend to the "machine" than a thorn in it's side and the action taken was markedly different. Go figure. Many things get overlooked here in Pleasantville. Why are you stirring the pot? In addition, if you are so concerned, one mans code violation fine has not been the reason this town finds itself to be in a very large financial mess. 100k worth of quarters does not qualify either. This is at best a large mismanagement debacle and at worse something much more "involved". I think that you should address the moral constitution of many others here in Harrison first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest piper Posted February 9, 2010 Report Share Posted February 9, 2010 well you're just plain stooopid. what a dumb responce, i know what i am talking about because i am in plumbing trade and deal with this stuff every day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 Come on now?!I assume they worked it out, agreed to terms that were mutually acceptable and payment is forthcoming. Besides, you would have them run right down and eagerly pay fines that were levied by a governing body that arbitrarily chooses to impose a fine or not. The same applys to the amount of that fine. I am not aware of all the particulars involved but I do know of similar instances where the accused violater was more of a friend to the "machine" than a thorn in it's side and the action taken was markedly different. Go figure. Many things get overlooked here in Pleasantville. Why are you stirring the pot? In addition, if you are so concerned, one mans code violation fine has not been the reason this town finds itself to be in a very large financial mess. 100k worth of quarters does not qualify either. This is at best a large mismanagement debacle and at worse something much more "involved". I think that you should address the moral constitution of many others here in Harrison first. My point is that the McCormicks moral constitution is no better than of those they criticize. I'm not saying they're worse than the rest of this group, they're the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest say sorry solid sam Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 what a dumb responce, i know what i am talking about because i am in plumbing trade and deal with this stuff every day ok sorry no offense single family residence - owner occupied and can show proficiency right? what does the permit fall under ? you do need a permit. just not the licensed professional part provided all above are present and town code official stamps said permit. sometimes you need to go before the board if he denies - and he can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.