Bubba a hit

[Guest Patriot]

Judging from the reception given Bubba tonite, it looks like the Defeatocrats have forgiven the empeached adultering sodomist of young girls. He gave a good speech, blaming everything on the Republicans (who would have guessed). He talked about his 8 years in office except he forgot to mention why he let Bin Laden escape after the Sudanese had him in custody and offered to turn him over to the U.S.; why he didn't respond to WTC 1; why he didn't respond to the USS Cole attack; why he didn't respond to the American Embassy attack in No. Africa; why he didn't respond to the military barracks attack in Lebanon. Many people (defeatocrats excluded) think 9/11 occured because Bin Laden grew emboldened because of the lack of responses to previous attacks and therefore Bubba is primarily responsible for 9/11. In any event, all that was forgiven tonight. All the American lives lost because of Bubba's inability to react to terrorist attacks was a memory long forgotten in the kumbaya chantings of the loony left. Even Michelle cracked a smile, she may actually be a slight bit proud to be an American.

[Guest Guest]

Judging from the reception given Bubba tonite, it looks like the Defeatocrats have forgiven the empeached adultering sodomist of young girls. He gave a good speech, blaming everything on the Republicans (who would have guessed). He talked about his 8 years in office except he forgot to mention why he let Bin Laden escape after the Sudanese had him in custody and offered to turn him over to the U.S.; why he didn't respond to WTC 1; why he didn't respond to the USS Cole attack; why he didn't respond to the American Embassy attack in No. Africa; why he didn't respond to the military barracks attack in Lebanon. Many people (defeatocrats excluded) think 9/11 occured because Bin Laden grew emboldened because of the lack of responses to previous attacks and therefore Bubba is primarily responsible for 9/11. In any event, all that was forgiven tonight. All the American lives lost because of Bubba's inability to react to terrorist attacks was a memory long forgotten in the kumbaya chantings of the loony left. Even Michelle cracked a smile, she may actually be a slight bit proud to be an American.

You're an idiot.

And if you want a second opinion, you're a nasty idiot.

Put Bush up against Clinton today and see who would win.

[Guest Guest]

Judging from the reception given Bubba tonite, it looks like the Defeatocrats have forgiven the empeached adultering sodomist of young girls. He gave a good speech, blaming everything on the Republicans (who would have guessed). He talked about his 8 years in office except he forgot to mention why he let Bin Laden escape after the Sudanese had him in custody and offered to turn him over to the U.S.; why he didn't respond to WTC 1; why he didn't respond to the USS Cole attack; why he didn't respond to the American Embassy attack in No. Africa; why he didn't respond to the military barracks attack in Lebanon. Many people (defeatocrats excluded) think 9/11 occured because Bin Laden grew emboldened because of the lack of responses to previous attacks and therefore Bubba is primarily responsible for 9/11. In any event, all that was forgiven tonight. All the American lives lost because of Bubba's inability to react to terrorist attacks was a memory long forgotten in the kumbaya chantings of the loony left. Even Michelle cracked a smile, she may actually be a slight bit proud to be an American.

Maybe someday you'll pull your head out your butt long enough to figure WHO was president on 9/11 and WHO had warnings that were casually ignored, probably too busy looking for the liquor cabinet in the White House.

Then again, that would probably be too FACTUAL to interest an REMF WANKER like you.

PatRat--------All lies all the time..............

[Guest guest]

Maybe someday you'll pull your head out your butt long enough to figure WHO was president on 9/11 and WHO had warnings that were casually ignored, probably too busy looking for the liquor cabinet in the White House.

Then again, that would probably be too FACTUAL to interest an REMF WANKER like you.

PatRat--------All lies all the time..............

Yeah! He just doesn't get it that the terrorists started planning that attack on the day Bush was sworn into office! Do you think Clinton had the warnings but casually ingnored them? Probably too busy chasing interns around the White House? or did he think "Won't be my problem soon, lets just stick to the next guy?

[Guest Guest]

The PatRat Value System:

Consensual adult sex should be a capital offense while starting a war costing thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of $$$ based on lies should be praised.

WHAT a NITWIT!

[Guest Guest]

Yeah! He just doesn't get it that the terrorists started planning that attack on the day Bush was sworn into office! Do you think Clinton had the warnings but casually ingnored them? Probably too busy chasing interns around the White House? or did he think "Won't be my problem soon, lets just stick to the next guy?

"Do you think Clinton had the warnings"?? I think the first bombing of the WTC, Marine barracks and U.S. Embassys might be considered a warning (none of which Clinton responded to). No wonder Bin Laden considered the U.S. a paper tiger.

[Guest 2smart4u]

The PatRat Value System:Consensual adult sex should be a capital offense while starting a war costing thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of $$$ based on lies should be praised.WHAT a NITWIT!

The President of the U.S. forces himself on a white house intern 30 years younger than himself forcing her to perform oral sex on him. When found out, lies to Congress, denying it happened. Loony Left Kool-Aid spin: Consensual adult sex, what's the problem??

[Guest Guest]

The President of the U.S. forces himself on a white house intern 30 years younger than himself forcing her to perform oral sex on him. When found out, lies to Congress, denying it happened. Loony Left Kool-Aid spin: Consensual adult sex, what's the problem??

Just ANOTHER ASININE Kool-Aid statement from 2DUMB4WORDS!

Do you have ANY FACTUAL evidence to support your idiotic accusations of rape or are you as AFRAID of FACTS as your alter-ego PatRat?

[Guest 2smart4u]

Just ANOTHER ASININE Kool-Aid statement from 2DUMB4WORDS!

Do you have ANY FACTUAL evidence to support your idiotic accusations of rape or are you as AFRAID of FACTS as your alter-ego PatRat?

Common sense tells you a young intern would feel intimidated and afraid to resist the sexual advances of the President. If you don't get that then you're dumber than most Loonies.

[Guest Guest]

Common sense tells you a young intern would feel intimidated and afraid to resist the sexual advances of the President. If you don't get that then you're dumber than most Loonies.

Common sense would also dictate some level of shame in bankrupting this country for an illegal war of aggression, but you won't find any of that in the Bush administration. Classic example of criticizing the other side of what your side is worse with.

[Guest Guest]

Common sense tells you a young intern would feel intimidated and afraid to resist the sexual advances of the President. If you don't get that then you're dumber than most Loonies.

IF YOU had any sense you'd realize many women are attracted to both intelligence and power, do you really think women go for Donald Trump's looks? Since you obviously have neither I guess you just can't understand.

And as has been previously stated, you have NOTHING FACTUAL to support your ASININE allegations.

WANKER!

[Guest Guest]

Common sense tells you a young intern would feel intimidated and afraid to resist the sexual advances of the President. If you don't get that then you're dumber than most Loonies.

Common sense tells me that you make many baseless statements with no connection to reality. Both you and PattyRat couldn't identify one fact uttered by either of you two nitwits.

[Bern]

Common sense tells you a young intern would feel intimidated and afraid to resist the sexual advances of the President. If you don't get that then you're dumber than most Loonies.

I know if a boss did that in the work place to an underling, he'd be out the door in an instant.

[Guest Guest]

I know if a boss did that in the work place to an underling, he'd be out the door in an instant.

Do you enjoy wearing those blinders? Consensual adult sex has been going on in the workplace for decades and was hardly new during Clinton's term.

Please cite EXACTLY when/where Monica has ever testified under oath that she felt coerced into sex.

Failing that we'll all know you're just blowing meaningless smoke and have become a member of the 2DUMB4WORDS club.

[Guest Guest]

I know if a boss did that in the work place to an underling, he'd be out the door in an instant.

Did what? Had unforced sex? You must have a very sheltered life. Sex in the workplace between boss/subordinate is very common, bosses are often the biggest and most frequent offenders against company policy. There's never been any indication that Lewinsky's dalliance with Clinton was anything but her choice.

[Bern]

Do you enjoy wearing those blinders? Consensual adult sex has been going on in the workplace for decades and was hardly new during Clinton's term.

Please cite EXACTLY when/where Monica has ever testified under oath that she felt coerced into sex.

Failing that we'll all know you're just blowing meaningless smoke and have become a member of the 2DUMB4WORDS club.

It does not matter if it is consensual. If you screw in the office with an underling and you are found out, you will be terminated. It is a serious ethics violation.

If you worked in a business environment, within the last 20-30 years, you would know that.

[Bern]

Did what? Had unforced sex? You must have a very sheltered life. Sex in the workplace between boss/subordinate is very common, bosses are often the biggest and most frequent offenders against company policy. There's never been any indication that Lewinsky's dalliance with Clinton was anything but her choice.

Not in this day and age. Its an instant career killer. Not only will you be terminated, you will also be blacklisted. No company can afford to hire someone who dallies with his or her subordinates.

There are certain circumstances when romantic or sexual relationships are expressly prohibited, unless managed as described below:

1. if between a supervisor and his/her supervised employee,

2. if between a faculty member and his/her student (including without limitation graduate students),

3. if between a supervising staff or student (including graduate student or teaching assistant) and his/her student, and/or

4. if between a senior faculty member and a junior faculty member supervised by the senior faculty member.

The university considers sexual relationships between faculty (including teaching assistants and laboratory supervisors) and their students or between supervisors and their employees, even if deemed to be mutually consenting relationships, to be a basic violation of professional ethics and responsibility when one party has any professional responsibility for the other's academic or job performance or professional future. Because of the asymmetry of these relationships, "consent" may be difficult to assess, may be deemed not possible, and may be construed as coercive. Such relationships also may have the potential to result in claims of sexual harassment.

http://studentaffairs.case.edu/office/hand...consensual.html

The above rules are the standard for all American (and every other modern industrialized country). Sex between bosses and their subordinates cannot be condoned, even if "consensual", because the work relationship makes it coercive.

Maybe in African countries like Uganda you can do this stuff.

[Guest Guest]

It does not matter if it is consensual. If you screw in the office with an underling and you are found out, you will be terminated. It a serious ethics violation.

If you worked in a business environment, within the last 20-30 years, you would know that.

You're thinking is a perfect example of:

In theory, theory and practice are the same, in practice they're not.

When THE BOSS is screwing someone just WHO do you think is going to do the firing? It happens far more often than you apparently think.

[Guest Guest]

It does not matter if it is consensual. If you screw in the office with an underling and you are found out, you will be terminated. It a serious ethics violation.

If you worked in a business environment, within the last 20-30 years, you would know that.

If you really want to talk about ethics violations let's talk about selling weapons to an enemy, THAT's an ethics violation, not to mention treason. Yet Resmuglicans bow down and worship the man who did it. Makes consensual sex look like nothing in comparison.

[Bern]

If you really want to talk about ethics violations let's talk about selling weapons to an enemy, THAT's an ethics violation, not to mention treason. Yet Resmuglicans bow down and worship the man who did it. Makes consensual sex look like nothing in comparison.

You can't argue the reply, so you change the topic.

If you're in a high school debate and the other person argues a fact or made an assertion and you responded as above, you would get a big fat F.

[Bern]

You're thinking is a perfect example of:

In theory, theory and practice are the same, in practice they're not.

When THE BOSS is screwing someone just WHO do you think is going to do the firing? It happens far more often than you apparently think.

Like this

Harry Stonecipher, the steady, experienced operator brought in to head Boeing 15 months ago following one scandal, was ousted as chief executive today following allegations of an improper relationship with a female company executive.

Boeing shares fell to $57.96 in pre-market trade in New York, down by 42 cents.

Boeing announced that Mr Stonecipher would be replaced by its chief financial officer, James Bell, on an interim basis.

The board, which Boeing said "asked for and received" Mr Stonecipher’s resignation, took action following an investigation into "a personal relationship between Mr Stonecipher and a female executive of the company who did not report directly to him".

[Bern]

Common sense would also dictate some level of shame in bankrupting this country for an illegal war of aggression, but you won't find any of that in the Bush administration. Classic example of criticizing the other side of what your side is worse with.

Another example of changing the subject when facts cannot be refuted. It would be better if you did not reply. Less embarrassing than replying in an irrelevant manner.

[Guest Guest]

Like this

You conveniently ignore the FACT that many cases DO NOT get publicity because companies casually look the other way.

I have first hand knowledge of a boss who was boffing his secretary in a large, multi-national coorporation, he was sent to a Canadian division for a while to cool his heels and wound up getting a major promotion to division chief, I've heard similar tales from others in other companies. Press about those who get caught and punished says nothing about the many who aren't.