Jump to content

Terrorist Plot


Guest BushBacker

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest BushBacker
And the cowboy did what to correct all these GLARING problrms you allege Clinton left?

STILL no answer.  WANKER!

Since Bush has much higher morals than Clinton, I'm sure he changed the policy of commiting adultery in the White House and lying to congress under oath.

He also corrected the "hands off the terrorists" policy of the Clinton administration and the "FBI doesn't talk to the CIA" policy. And he took the Kool-aid out of the White House vending machines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Bush has much higher morals than Clinton, I'm sure he changed the policy of commiting adultery in the White House and lying to congress under oath.

  He also corrected the "hands off the terrorists" policy of the Clinton administration and the "FBI doesn't talk to the CIA" policy. And he took the Kool-aid out of the White House vending machines.

THE question is WHAT did Bush do to prevent 9/11 in the time he had anf=d YOU have yet to offer any answer other than your usual blather and asinine Kool-Aid stupidity. YOU HAVE NO ANSWER, WANKER!

By the way, has anyone changed the Reagan policy of selling weapons to enemy states and conveniently forgetting before Congress or is that still in the neo-Nazi-con guide book?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Bush has much higher morals than Clinton, I'm sure he changed the policy of commiting adultery in the White House and lying to congress under oath.

  He also corrected the "hands off the terrorists" policy of the Clinton administration and the "FBI doesn't talk to the CIA" policy. And he took the Kool-aid out of the White House vending machines.

Why don't you answer the question that was asked?

Lying to start a war exhibits higher morals?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Bush has much higher morals than Clinton, I'm sure he changed the policy of commiting adultery in the White House and lying to congress under oath.

  He also corrected the "hands off the terrorists" policy of the Clinton administration and the "FBI doesn't talk to the CIA" policy. And he took the Kool-aid out of the White House vending machines.

The question was what the cowboy did in 7 1/2 months to avert 9/11.

Your continued use of Kool-Aid IS boring, stupid, asinine, and meaningless but offers NO answer anytime you're asked a question.

The real truth is probably that you yourself have no idea why you support this man in his lies and incompetence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Bush has much higher morals than Clinton, I'm sure he changed the policy of commiting adultery in the White House and lying to congress under oath.

 

LYING to the entire country about things like uranium purchases and ties to al Qaeda as reasons to go to war is a display of higher morals? YOU have a very strange value system.

And let's not forget a REPUBLICAN senate was unable to convict Clinton. The only reason removing Bus wouldn't be a good idea is that we be stuck with his Dick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Bush has much higher morals than Clinton, I'm sure he changed the policy of commiting adultery in the White House and lying to congress under oath.

  He also corrected the "hands off the terrorists" policy of the Clinton administration and the "FBI doesn't talk to the CIA" policy. And he took the Kool-aid out of the White House vending machines.

According to you wankers Clinton left behind such obvious, glaring problems in terror control that they should have beenapparent to a blind man. yet 7 1/2 months later we had 9/11 on Bush's watch. WHY?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LYING to the entire country about things like uranium purchases and ties to al Qaeda as reasons to go to war is a display of higher morals?  YOU have a very strange value system.

And let's not forget a REPUBLICAN senate was unable to convict Clinton.  The only reason removing Bus wouldn't be a good idea is that we be stuck with his Dick.

And yet British intelligence stands by that same information. We then come to find that perhaps Joe Wilson was not QUITE on the up and up. Although the attempt to smear insiders in the Bush administration was great entertainment. The TV news even touted it as fact. Of course, we now know that it wasn't Rove, Fitzgerald new of Armitage from early on, and yet proceeded with a dubious investigation. Do I get to feel persecuted now?

And just for the record, not ONE member of the Senate could be bothered to examine the evidence, they lacked the political will for Impeachment.

Since everyone is interested in FACTS, this fact can be verified in Schippers book SELL OUT. They kept a log of the people reviewing the evidence, and not ONE person signed. Too bad the keepers of the Archives weren't that thorough, they may even have stopped Sandy Berglar (hee!hee!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BushBacker
According to you wankers Clinton left behind such obvious, glaring problems in terror control that they should have beenapparent to a blind man. yet 7 1/2 months later we had 9/11 on Bush's watch.  WHY?

Because Bin Laden was still alive. Now lets see..... who is responsible for Bin Laden being alive on 9/11 ??? Here's a few clues; This man has been empeached and disbarred. He is a rapist and an adulterer. He has lied to congress under oath and in a televised speech to the american public. He is a Kool-aid drinking defeatocrat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question was what the cowboy did in 7 1/2 months to avert 9/11.

Your continued use of Kool-Aid IS boring, stupid, asinine, and meaningless but offers NO answer anytime you're asked a question.

The real truth is probably that you yourself have no idea why you support this man in his lies and incompetence.

You have to understand that some people just choose to talk out of their butt when they have nothing better to say or if they don't agree with you. You are absolutely right Bush is an incompetent man and a liar, he can't even get his own country together with respect to Louisiana and the hurricane, it seems that he has spent all of our money in some war that means nothing and based on LIES.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest KearnyKard
According to you wankers Clinton left behind such obvious, glaring problems in terror control that they should have beenapparent to a blind man. yet 7 1/2 months later we had 9/11 on Bush's watch.  WHY?

According to all intelligence reports, planning for 9/11 began in the 90's. Clinton had 8 years and didn't uncover the plot because of his "don't share info" policy.

Bush had less than 8 months, hardly enough time to change the culture that existed for 8 years.

Sudan had Bin Laden and wanted to turn him over to the U.S. Clinton refused to take him.

Democrats don't like to acknowledge that 9/11 would most likely have been prevented if Clinton had agreed to take Bin Laden from the Sudanese. But it's true, without Bin Laden, 9/11 wouldn't have happened.

If you're going to blame anyone for 9/11, blame Clinton. And without 9/11, the war in Iraq wouldn't have happened, so you can blame Clinton for that too.

Democrats are truly "defeatocrats".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest a proud american
According to you wankers Clinton left behind such obvious, glaring problems in terror control that they should have beenapparent to a blind man. yet 7 1/2 months later we had 9/11 on Bush's watch.  WHY?

It is simple to explain, but you have to be able to read and comprehend the answer. If you can do that than you will know that for atleast three months after Clinton left office his National Security Team remained in place to assist the Bush Administration at Bush's urging. Prior to him taking office he had met with them and asked them to stay on. However, it became apparent that after a few months the Bush people either showed no interest or refused to cooperate so they moved on. You also have to remember that Bush spent about 42% of his time early on vacationing. When he was given the now famous PDB that he never read, he would have seen that the threat was imminent. At the very least he could have put the FAA on alert and have the security increased and at the most he could have pressed the intelligence community to look at the hard data. Remember the PDB came from the CIA. While Clinton has and always will be in a position that you either like him or you don't he atleast read his breifings. If President Bush was unhappy with the intelligence he was getting or was concerned about the August PDB he could have done something. He didn't. Now its always popular to rewrite history to fit into anyones beliefs, 9/11 happened on his watch just like 93 happened on Clintons watch. So if you blame Clinton for 93 even though he was in office less than a month, then you have to blame Bush. Especially since he was in office 71/2 months. IF you remember after 9/11, the Senate stated that they would do their own investigation on how and why it happened. Five years later and they've done nothing. Why is that?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest KearnyKard
The question was what the cowboy did in 7 1/2 months to avert 9/11.

Your continued use of Kool-Aid IS boring, stupid, asinine, and meaningless but offers NO answer anytime you're asked a question.

The real truth is probably that you yourself have no idea why you support this man in his lies and incompetence.

It's been documented that planning for 9/11 began in the 90's. Clinton had 8 years to uncover the plot, Bush had less than 8 months. Drink Up, Kool-aider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to all intelligence reports, planning for 9/11 began in the 90's.  Clinton had 8 years and didn't uncover the plot because of his "don't share info" policy.

  Bush had less than 8 months, hardly enough time to change the culture that existed for 8 years.

  Sudan had Bin Laden and wanted to turn him over to the U.S. Clinton refused to take him.

  Democrats don't like to acknowledge that 9/11 would most likely have been prevented if Clinton had agreed to take Bin Laden from the Sudanese. But it's true, without Bin Laden, 9/11 wouldn't have happened.

  If you're going to blame anyone for 9/11, blame Clinton. And without 9/11, the war in Iraq wouldn't have happened, so you can blame Clinton for that too.

  Democrats are truly "defeatocrats".

And Bush did what in that time? STILL no answer!

You're certainly a Kard in one respect, you're a birdbrain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet British intelligence stands by that same information.  We then come to find that perhaps Joe Wilson was not QUITE on the up and up.  Although the attempt to smear insiders in the Bush administration was great entertainment.  The TV news even touted it as fact.  Of course, we now know that it wasn't Rove, Fitzgerald new of Armitage from early on, and yet proceeded with a dubious investigation.  Do I get to feel persecuted now?

And just for the record, not ONE member of the Senate could be bothered to examine the evidence, they lacked the political will for Impeachment.

Since everyone is interested in FACTS, this fact can be verified in Schippers book SELL OUT.  They kept a log of the people reviewing the evidence, and not ONE person signed.  Too bad the keepers of the Archives weren't that thorough, they may even have stopped Sandy Berglar (hee!hee!)

From what I've read British Intelligence stands by the FACT that Iraq had NO TIES to 9/11.

Maybe people didn't review your so called evidence because it WAS NOT evidence of an act justifying removal from office?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Bin Laden was still alive. Now lets see..... who is responsible for Bin Laden being alive on 9/11 ???  Here's a few clues;  This man has been empeached and disbarred. He is a rapist and an adulterer. He has lied to congress under oath and in a televised speech to the american public. He is a Kool-aid drinking defeatocrat.

I'm forwarding this to Bill with the suggestion he sue you for your LIES.

Rapist? You are just a sexually repressed neo-Nazi-con who just can't ver someone having sex.

YOU of course adore commiters of TREASON intead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Bin Laden was still alive. Now lets see..... who is responsible for Bin Laden being alive on 9/11 ???  Here's a few clues;  This man has been empeached and disbarred. He is a rapist and an adulterer. He has lied to congress under oath and in a televised speech to the american public. He is a Kool-aid drinking defeatocrat.

Adultery is an issue solely between the affected. not a crime in most states, not an impeachable offense, and has nothing to do with ability to govern. Rapist, that's just more of your blather with NO FACTUAL BASIS. If you want to sling names let's talk about that drunk you back.

GET OVER Clinton!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He's a private citizen. It's apparent that you wankers have little positive to say in support of your little cowboy drunk so you have to resort to cheap innuendo. Too bad you can't explain logically the LIES of a man who promises to get those responsible for 9/11 and then invades a country with NO TIES to 9/11.

Chanting RAPIST just doesn't explain THAT BULLSH*T! Siumble back to your barstool and have another beer. Try some FACTS sometime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Bin Laden was still alive. Now lets see..... who is responsible for Bin Laden being alive on 9/11 ???  Here's a few clues;  This man has been empeached and disbarred. He is a rapist and an adulterer.

Rapist? I guess that ASININE, BASELESS statement is just another indication of the neo-NAZI-con desire to trample the Constitution and subvert due process.

Is there ANY hope that YOU might someday actually make an attempt at a FACT BASED statement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  If you're going to blame anyone for 9/11, blame Clinton. And without 9/11, the war in Iraq wouldn't have happened, so you can blame Clinton for that too.

  Democrats are truly "defeatocrats".

Without an arrogant shoot from the hip cowboy pursuing a personal vendetta from the White House the war in Iraq wouldn't have happened you WANKER!

Iraq HAS/HAD NO TIES TO 9/11

TRY LOOKING AT THE TRUTH

NEO-NAZI-CONS ARE TRULY DELUSOPNAL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been documented that planning for 9/11 began in the 90's. Clinton had 8 years to uncover the plot, Bush had less than 8 months.  Drink Up, Kool-aider.

The question IS STILL WHAT the cowboy did, NOT what a private citizen did.

YOU STILL have NO ANSWER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  If you're going to blame anyone for 9/11, blame Clinton. And without 9/11, the war in Iraq wouldn't have happened, so you can blame Clinton for that too.

  Democrats are truly "defeatocrats".

At best, idle speculation about the war in Iraq. There's been a number of statements by people associated with the administration tht make a good case that deposing Saddam was on the cowboy's agenda long before 9/11.

The c0ntinual neo-Nazi-con attempt is just a lot of mumbo-jumbo trying to justify a poorly planned, poorly executed war of choice that in the long term is unlikely to be of any benefit to the US.

So TRY to put some facts in your Repulsivecan blather occasionally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest a proud american
The question IS STILL WHAT the cowboy did, NOT what a private citizen did.

YOU STILL have NO ANSWER.

They can't answer the questions because they can't distinguish between fact and fiction. They know no other truth than what they are told on fox news and the neo-con websites. Thats why I enjoy this web site so much. It shows 2 things. How truly ignorant they are and how people who really understand whats going on can make fools of the neo-cons time after time. If they would just take the time to look up the facts, its not that hard to do, they would see for themselves how stupid and misinformed they are. However there is hope. Maybe one of them will actually try and look up information and really understand what's happening to this country. If anyone has seen the documentary on Goldwater produced by his grand daughter they would hear in his own words his fears for the future of the conservative movement. What we see today is exactly what he feared. And as usual, don't take my word for it CHECK IT OUT for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest BushBacker
The question IS STILL WHAT the cowboy did, NOT what a private citizen did.

YOU STILL have NO ANSWER.

On Fox news tonite, a former CIA operative was interviewed. He was asked if Clinton could have gotten Bin Laden. This CIA operative said " In the late 90's we had Bin Laden cornered. We could have killed him easily. Clinton refused to pull the trigger."

There it is, Kool-aiders, undeniable proof that 9/11 could have been averted.

( I can't wait to read how the defeatocrats spin this one) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest a proud american
On Fox news tonite, a former CIA operative was interviewed. He was asked if Clinton could have gotten Bin Laden.  This CIA operative said " In the late 90's we had Bin Laden cornered. We could have killed him easily. Clinton refused to pull the trigger."

  There it is, Kool-aiders, undeniable proof that 9/11 could have been averted.

( I can't wait to read how the defeatocrats spin this one) .

Your response says it all. Fox News. Sure he could have gotten him but in order to get him, we would have had to kill everyone including children who were playing outside at the time. And again, there was no firm evidence that bin Laden was there. Now perhaps killing children is ok with you but lets fast forward to late 2001 when we had him cornered in Tora Bora. What did we do and was the CIA operative asked that question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...