Kent State Anniversary

[Guest Guest]

I've been away for a few days and I see nothing has changed. The Kool-aiders are still name calling. I think some anger management is in order.

  "paving a political path"  ??  Typical .  When you can't use logic, throw in a  cryptic phrase.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You're correct nothing has changed. The religious hostilities in the middle-east existed for centuries before the US was founded and it's just not realistic to think your hero cowboy is going to change that.

[Guest Guest]

For once you are correct, you CANNOT explain why having a former active member of a terrorist party as PM of Ieaq is good for America so you resort to your asinine statements about Kool-Aid.  Might as well say Dubya is the way he is because he drank so much Jim Beam.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Maybe has had a few drinks in his day. Buttttt! he don't smoke it, snort it, or shoot it in his arm the good ol democratic way thank you

[Guest Guest]

Maybe has had a few drinks in his day. Buttttt! he don't smoke it, snort it, or shoot it in his arm the good ol democratic way thank you

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Then he's only acting like he's high? OSCAR winning performance!

[Guest Guest]

YOU are the one who needs to do better Abner, you are typical of those who have no answer to a simple question, you resort to name calling and stupid comments.

I will make a very simple statement with no name calling.

I don't thinks it's good for America that Iraq has elected a PM known to have been an active member of a terrorist party

SIMPLE question:  WHY do YOU think it's GOOD for America?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

STILL NO ANSWER to a SIMPLE question for all you BushWankers.

Why is it good for America that Iraq has elected a PM known to have been an active member of a terrorist party?

I guess when you WANKERS can't answer with some stupid Kool-Aid remark or tawdry jokes about Bill Clinton you have NO ANSWER.

[Guest Guest]

STILL NO ANSWER to a SIMPLE question for all you BushWankers.

Why is it good for America that Iraq has elected a PM known to have been an active member of a terrorist party?

I guess when you WANKERS can't answer with some stupid Kool-Aid remark or tawdry jokes about Bill Clinton you have NO ANSWER.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Because it WAS their choice..something thay havent had since the 50's?? Frankly it doesnt much matter whether their choice is "Good" for America, as much as whether their choice is good for THEM. The really amusing thing is that no matter WHO they chose, you'd find something wrong with it. I remember all the jokes about the purple fingers..the REAL Wankers are those of you who take for granted the very, VERY Precious gift that we have..Our Democracy. Maybe if some of you bothered to talk to the people who have been there, you might realize just HOW much good has been done. Or will i get the usual "Our Troops are Brainwashed Idiots" Speach???

[Guest Guest]

Because it WAS their choice..something thay havent had since the 50's??  Frankly it doesnt much matter whether their choice is "Good" for America, as much as whether their choice is good for THEM.  The really amusing thing is that no matter WHO they chose, you'd find something wrong with it.  I remember all the jokes about the purple fingers..the REAL Wankers are those of you who take for granted the very, VERY Precious gift that we have..Our Democracy.  Maybe if some of you bothered to talk to the people who have been there, you might realize just HOW much good has been done.  Or will i get the usual "Our Troops are Brainwashed Idiots" Speach???

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It has NOTHING to do with OUR DEMOCRACY. You're absolutely right, it was THEIR choice but when THEIR choice is someone known to have been an active member of a terrorist party I hardly think it was worth OUR investment in blood and over $300 billion to GIVE them that choice. It's like giving someone who's already told you he despises you a loaded gun.

I HAVE bothered to talk to some who have been there, sure some good has been done but that doesn't change the overall picture. Just because troops are doing their jobs and doing them well DOES NOT MEAN they are part of a well planned strategy that will benefit America in the long term.

I totally disagree that it doesn't matter if their choice is good for America. This is SUPPOSED to be a war on terror, not an effort to give the gift of democracy to those who would turn and attack us.

[Guest Guest]

Because it WAS their choice..something thay havent had since the 50's??  Frankly it doesnt much matter whether their choice is "Good" for America, as much as whether their choice is good for THEM.  The really amusing thing is that no matter WHO they chose, you'd find something wrong with it.  I remember all the jokes about the purple fingers..the REAL Wankers are those of you who take for granted the very, VERY Precious gift that we have..Our Democracy.  Maybe if some of you bothered to talk to the people who have been there, you might realize just HOW much good has been done.  Or will i get the usual "Our Troops are Brainwashed Idiots" Speach???

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Why do you waste your time argueing with this clown? you will never get him/her to understand what is really at risk. These people want the United States to become socialist where people depend on the government and chuck Shumer to get by. Don't get carpel tunnel trying to explain to this mindless drone who thinks it's cool to be anti anything. God Bless America!!!!

[Guest Guest]

Because it WAS their choice..something thay havent had since the 50's??  Frankly it doesnt much matter whether their choice is "Good" for America, as much as whether their choice is good for THEM. 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

So we should fight like hell with no concern for what the outcome may be? By your logic we would welcome the election of an al Qaeda operative because it was their choice. I think you are way off target.

And why do we discriminate? There are many places in the world that are not democracies. Why Iraq when in your way of thinking "it doesnt much matter whether their choice is "Good" for America"? Why? Why not North Korea? Why not Syria? Why not Saudi Arabia? Why not Belarus?

Making such a large effort when "it doesnt much matter whether their choice is "Good" for America" makes no sense at all.

[Guest Guest]

  Or will i get the usual "Our Troops are Brainwashed Idiots" Speach???

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I think it's the small percentage that believe Bush that are the brainwashed idiots. It's time he quit the lie of thinking you can fight a war on terror and spread democracy at the same time. Giving the vote to those who elect a leader with known terrorist association in his past does nothing to aid the war on terror.

Most people would like to have their cake and eat it too, can you explain how that's possible?

[Guest Guest]

Why do you waste your time argueing with this clown? you will never get him/her to understand what is really at risk. These people want the United States to become socialist where people depend on the government and chuck Shumer to get by. Don't get carpel tunnel trying to explain to this mindless drone who thinks it's cool to be anti anything. God Bless America!!!!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

And you of course would rather allow the people of other countries to depend on our government while it tells our own citizens to go screw. You don't understand what's at risk. Our primary purpose should be protecting America and fostering the election of those who wouldn't think twice about doing us harm doesn't accomplish that. Lets's hope God Blesses America beacuse the alleged leaders don't seem too concerned.

[Guest 2smart4u]

I think it's the small percentage that believe Bush that are the brainwashed idiots.  It's time he quit the lie of thinking you can fight a war on terror and spread democracy at the same time.  Giving the vote to those who elect a leader with known terrorist association in his past does nothing to aid the war on terror.

Most people would like to have their cake and eat it too, can you explain how that's possible?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

After you explain why your momma raised an idiot.

[Guest Mother]

And you of course would rather allow the people of other countries to depend on our government while it tells our own citizens to go screw.  You don't understand what's at risk.  Our primary purpose should be protecting America and fostering the election of those who wouldn't think twice about doing us harm doesn't accomplish that.  Lets's hope God Blesses America beacuse the alleged leaders don't seem too concerned.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I would bet dollars to donuts that GW's ego understands full well that no commander and chief ever recieves positive acclaim through the blood of his expired or wounded military warriors. I feel as this vacilating learning curve on combating these radical Islamic parasites continues to peak GW must not forget if he lose's his command and control usefullness in the minds eye of his MOS warriors his persona becomes the topic of general conversation and not his political policies.

[Guest Guest]

After you explain why your momma raised an idiot.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

A typical BushWanker who has no intelligent response so resorts to name calling and family slurs. Why don't you go for the full BushWaker Trifecta and make a Kool-Aid remark too?

I guess when your idea of a hero is someone who bravely defended the skies of Alabama during a war it seriously warps your judgement.

[Guest Guest]

I would bet dollars to donuts that GW's ego understands full well that no commander and chief ever recieves positive acclaim through the blood of his expired or wounded military warriors. I feel as this vacilating learning curve on combating these radical Islamic parasites continues to peak GW must not forget if he lose's his command and control usefullness in the minds eye of his MOS warriors his persona becomes the topic of general conversation and not his political policies.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You'd lose that bet, the fact that GW's initial statement to this whole mess referred to it as a Crusade just underscores his poor knowledge of the history of the region and severe lack of understanding of the situation. The only thing his outsized ego seems to understand is macho posturing BS like the aircraft carrier display and the dog & pony show held in Iraq.

He'd get positive acclaim if he deserved it but going off half-cocked with dubious reasons and no long range planning merits no acclaim.

"Stay the course" is merely a slogan when no course has been planned or defined. The troops and the American people deserve better.

[Guest Patriot]

You'd lose that bet, the fact that GW's initial statement to this whole mess referred to it as a Crusade just underscores his poor knowledge of the history of the region and severe lack of understanding of the situation.  The only thing his outsized ego seems to understand is macho posturing BS like the aircraft carrier display and the dog & pony show held in Iraq.

He'd get positive acclaim if he deserved it but going off half-cocked with dubious reasons and no long range planning merits no acclaim.

"Stay the course" is merely a slogan when no course has been planned or defined.  The troops and the American people deserve better.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

As General Eisenhower said during WWII,"You cannot "plan" a war. You can set goals and possible timelines to attain those goals, but enemy actions frequently alter any plans. War is an ebb and flow and actions are constantly changing and evolving to counter enemy actions. (Unless you're George Bush, then the Kool-aiders think you should have had a "plan" and an "exit strategy").

I wonder if General McArthur was asked about an "exit strategy" after Pearl Harbor was attacked ??

[Guest Guest]

As General Eisenhower said during WWII,"You cannot "plan" a war.  You can set goals and possible timelines to attain those goals, but enemy actions frequently alter any plans.  War is an ebb and flow and actions are constantly changing and evolving to counter enemy actions.  (Unless you're George Bush, then the Kool-aiders think you should have had a "plan" and an "exit strategy").

  I wonder if General McArthur was asked about an "exit strategy" after Pearl Harbor was attacked ??

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

And WHAT goals have been set? First he claims to be fighting a war on terror and then to be spreading democracy. Enabling the election of those with known ties to terrorist activities who propose amnesty for insurgents appear to be at cross purposes.

Of course wars evolve but there are still overall strategies that will guide tactics. Unfortunately this man has no clearly defined goals that would allow a sreategy to be formed.

Ironic that you compare Generals Eisenhower and MacArthur with this 'brave' defender of the Alabama skies.

[Guest Guest]

As General Eisenhower said during WWII,"You cannot "plan" a war.  You can set goals and possible timelines to attain those goals, but enemy actions frequently alter any plans.  War is an ebb and flow and actions are constantly changing and evolving to counter enemy actions.  (Unless you're George Bush, then the Kool-aiders think you should have had a "plan" and an "exit strategy").

  I wonder if General McArthur was asked about an "exit strategy" after Pearl Harbor was attacked ??

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Exit strategy? The REAL problem is he had no entry strategy. Three years ago he told us "Mission Accomplished" and HIS mission probably had been, he toppled daddy's nemesis. The real problem is the lack of strategic planning beyond that point. Or was "Mission Accomploshed" just a bald-faced lie?

[Guest Guest]

As General Eisenhower said during WWII,"You cannot "plan" a war.  You can set goals and possible timelines to attain those goals, but enemy actions frequently alter any plans.  War is an ebb and flow and actions are constantly changing and evolving to counter enemy actions.  (Unless you're George Bush, then the Kool-aiders think you should have had a "plan" and an "exit strategy").

  I wonder if General McArthur was asked about an "exit strategy" after Pearl Harbor was attacked ??

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Tactics change with an ongoing war but long range strategy can surely be planned and there's been precious little evidence given that there is one.

[Guest BushBacker]

Exit strategy?  The REAL problem is he had no entry strategy.  Three years ago he told us "Mission Accomplished" and HIS mission probably had been, he toppled daddy's nemesis.  The real problem is the lack of strategic planning beyond that point.  Or was "Mission Accomploshed" just a bald-faced lie?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

"Lack of strategic planning" ?? You ?? Insignificant little you supposes to know what strategies President Bush and his Generals have discussed or implemented ?? You're doing way too much Kool-aid.

[Guest Guest]

"Lack of strategic planning" ??  You ??  Insignificant little you supposes to know what strategies President Bush and his Generals have discussed or implemented ??  You're doing way too much Kool-aid.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

YOU REALLY are a BushWANKER, if it weren't for name calling and your asinine Kool-Aid remarks you'd have nothing to say.

Yeah, I know, in your delusional little dream world the cowboy has a plan that's just so brilliant he dare not release it to the hi-polloi. Go sit in your corner and wait for Santa Claus.

[Guest BushBacker]

YOU REALLY are a BushWANKER, if it weren't for name calling and your asinine Kool-Aid remarks you'd have nothing to say.

Yeah, I know, in your delusional little dream world the cowboy has a plan that's just so brilliant he dare not release it to the hi-polloi.  Go sit in your corner and wait for Santa Claus.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Let me get this straight. You think military planning is normally made public, that the enemy is made aware of them ?? Wow !! You're dumber than I had thought. Go burn your american flag with the rest of your kind, read your NY Times and hide under your bed. Our military will protect your sorry ass.

[Guest Patriot]

Tactics change with an ongoing war but long range strategy can surely be planned and there's been precious little evidence given that there is one.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I disagree. Sadam is out. 3 free elections. Afganistan is free. Lybia is now on our side. Iraqi military is gaining strength, downsizing our military presence is beginning. Congratulations to our military and our Commander-In-Chief, George Bush. God bless you.

[Guest Guest]

YOU REALLY are a BushWANKER, if it weren't for name calling and your asinine Kool-Aid remarks you'd have nothing to say.

Yeah, I know, in your delusional little dream world the cowboy has a plan that's just so brilliant he dare not release it to the hi-polloi.  Go sit in your corner and wait for Santa Claus.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Admit it you hate America now go cash your welfare check and SHUT UP. What a dumb shit.

[Guest Guest]

Admit it you hate America now go cash your welfare check and SHUT UP. What a dumb shit.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Always nice to hear what the smart folks have to say.

Take your prejudicial, narrow minded, bigoted attitude and STICK IT UP YOUR BIG HOLE YOU RED-NECKED LITTLE S**T!

[Guest Guest]

Let me get this straight. You think military planning is normally made public, that the enemy is made aware of them ??  Wow !! You're dumber than I had thought.  Go burn your american flag with the rest of your kind, read your NY Times and hide under your bed. Our military will protect your sorry ass.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You must have a remarkable ability to read between the lines. Yes, generally when a country goes to war, at least a democratic country, the people will be told why? But, Bush has said to fight terror, because of WMDs, because Saddam sought uranium in Africa, to spread democracy. Some lies, some iffy, and some at cross purposes to each other.

And yes, when the time comes and it's due I will burn my American flag, it is the proper way to dispose of a worn flag but you are probably too stupid to know that.

You twits fear the NY Times because they expose your heroes like Nixon and Westmoreland for the liars they are. Go back to reading your comic books, or do you just look at the pictures?