Guest what'up? Posted October 9, 2007 Report Share Posted October 9, 2007 Anyone have info on the teacher suspended for 'sexual acts' with her students? Is she still suspended WITH pay? Any info on whether there has been or will be an arrest? This story seems to have been forgotten over the summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted October 10, 2007 Report Share Posted October 10, 2007 Anyone have info on the teacher suspended for 'sexual acts' with her students? Is she still suspended WITH pay? Any info on whether there has been or will be an arrest? This story seems to have been forgotten over the summer. 68851[/snapback] no one wants the public to know the real deal. Kearny High, has had to endure some very embarrassing issues this past school year. ms. adamski must still be getting paid, she was in the *** ***** too... she has ******, that she brought *** ** *** ******. how shameful KOTW Note: The above post was edited for content. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted October 10, 2007 Report Share Posted October 10, 2007 Its amazing that there was such a media frenzy over the Teacher who preached in the class, but not the teacher who allegedly had sex with several students. What if this was a male teacher and female students, you think everyone would be so quite about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted October 11, 2007 Report Share Posted October 11, 2007 NJ.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted October 11, 2007 Report Share Posted October 11, 2007 People can say alledged all they want anyone who was in her class could tell what was going on. I know people who still have saved text messages from her that would incriminate her in a second. Where's the Prosecuter on this case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strife767 Posted October 12, 2007 Report Share Posted October 12, 2007 Coincidentally, look what just popped up in Canessa's blog: Former Kearny High School English teacher Celeste Adamski has pled guilty to one count of official misconduct, and as part of a plea agreement, will never teach again, The Observer has learned. Adamski also admitted to having sexual intercourse with one of her students, who was 17 at the time. We'll have the entire story in the Oct. 17 edition of The Observer. At least she admitted to her wrongdoing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strife767 Posted October 12, 2007 Report Share Posted October 12, 2007 People can say alledged all they want anyone who was in her class could tell what was going on. I know people who still have saved text messages from her that would incriminate her in a second. Where's the Prosecuter on this case? 69042[/snapback] Text messages...was she trying to get caught or something? What an astonishingly stupid move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 Text messages...was she trying to get caught or something? What an astonishingly stupid move. 69147[/snapback] Is she good looking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strife767 Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 Is she good looking? 69178[/snapback] What does that have to do with there being clear evidence of her misconduct in text messages (which the cell phone company can easily retrieve if asked to in a situation like this)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonD Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 Coincidentally, look what just popped up in Canessa's blog:Former Kearny High School English teacher Celeste Adamski has pled guilty to one count of official misconduct, and as part of a plea agreement, will never teach again, The Observer has learned. Adamski also admitted to having sexual intercourse with one of her students, who was 17 at the time. We'll have the entire story in the Oct. 17 edition of The Observer. At least she admitted to her wrongdoing. 69087[/snapback] Yes, she admitted her wrongdoing, including having sexual intercourse with a minor, but the only plea was for official misconduct. It concerns me that she will not be registered as a sex offender and very well may take up another career involving children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strife767 Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 Yes, she admitted her wrongdoing, including having sexual intercourse with a minor, but the only plea was for official misconduct. It concerns me that she will not be registered as a sex offender and very well may take up another career involving children. 69244[/snapback] Yeah...I never really understood the justification behind the whole "plea bargain" thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 Yeah...I never really understood the justification behind the whole "plea bargain" thing. 69278[/snapback] Because it saves the cost of a trial Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Because it saves the cost of a trial 69353[/snapback] Also, the kid and his family may not have wanted a trial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Miss Crabtree Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Its amazing that there was such a media frenzy over the Teacher who preached in the class, but not the teacher who allegedly had sex with several students. What if this was a male teacher and female students, you think everyone would be so quite about it. 68918[/snapback] The sexes of the parties had nothing to do with it my dear. The philosophies of the parties involved did. Think about it. P.S. This young woman had a husband and young children. What they must be going through------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Madeline M.O. Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 What does that have to do with there being clear evidence of her misconduct in text messages (which the cell phone company can easily retrieve if asked to in a situation like this)? 69238[/snapback] "What you don't see with your eyes, don't invent with your mouth." --Jewish Proverb (ironic, huh?) Now that's classic-!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strife767 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Because it saves the cost of a trial 69353[/snapback] The pleading guilty part outside of court is fine, the part that always sounded fishy to me (unless I've completely misunderstood how it works) is the literal 'bargaining,' where charges are talked down as if it was a business deal being haggled. When it comes to criminal activity, I don't understand how it makes sense that one can apparently haggle with the charges brought against them. Did they break those laws or not? Anyway, it's drifting off topic now. If anyone feels so inclined, just PM me a reply instead of putting it here, if you would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strife767 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 "What you don't see with your eyes, don't invent with your mouth." --Jewish Proverb (ironic, huh?)Now that's classic-!!!!!!!!!!!!! 69410[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H Guest Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Its amazing that there was such a media frenzy over the Teacher who preached in the class, but not the teacher who allegedly had sex with several students. What if this was a male teacher and female students, you think everyone would be so quite about it. 68918[/snapback] You hit it right on the head...It's not that big a deal because the offender is a woman. If that had been a man; fuggedaboudit! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 What does that have to do with there being clear evidence of her misconduct in text messages (which the cell phone company can easily retrieve if asked to in a situation like this)? 69238[/snapback] Maybe someone's looking for a date. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 14, 2008 Report Share Posted January 14, 2008 Maybe someone's looking for a date. 69505[/snapback] ....And no mention in the Observer about sentencing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 15, 2008 Report Share Posted January 15, 2008 ....And no mention in the Observer about sentencing? 81121[/snapback] It was in the Jersey Journal, though: http://knj2.freebb3.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.