
D'Arco Retires Kearny Discuss our frontpage story

#5 *Guest*
Posted 21 June 2010 - 01:37 PM
#7 *Guest*
Posted 22 June 2010 - 08:09 AM
Guest, on Jun 21 2010, 01:37 PM, said:
Why can’t darco just leave NOW! He is not wanted or needed… There are a few more that need to climb down their podium so that this town can begin to heal and get back to the business of t
he people.
#9 *Guest*
Posted 23 June 2010 - 08:21 AM
Guest, on Jun 23 2010, 04:22 AM, said:
And we all wonder why the pension system is in trouble.
#11 *Guest*
Posted 24 June 2010 - 03:11 PM
Guest, on Jun 23 2010, 08:21 AM, said:
Moral is most definitely at an all time low. Ding Dong Hitler is gone! Need to clear a few more dead weight self righteous pompous A-HOLES. The town needs an enema.
#13 *Guest*
Posted 25 June 2010 - 09:30 AM
#14 *Guest*
Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:01 AM
Guest, on Jun 25 2010, 09:30 AM, said:
My problem isn't necessarily with the amount of his pension. If, in fact, he contributed for 42 year and is a veteran, he is entitled to whatever the formula for pensions is. My problem is that he is able to accept another full-time job making a full salary. Big deal, he isn't accepting benefits or a car from Paramus.
Those that the governor claims are raping the system (teachers) cannot do that. Teachers have a very limited amount of money they can earn while collecting their pension before it affects them and gets them into trouble with the system. I'm pretty sure that it's much less than what D'Arco will be getting as BA for Paramus.
#15
Posted 28 June 2010 - 09:46 PM
When is a retirement not a retirement yet it's considered a retirement and comes with full compensation – when you work for local government in the State of New Jersey.
#16 *Thoughtful*
Posted 29 June 2010 - 03:47 PM
wu-su, on Jun 28 2010, 09:46 PM, said:
When is a retirement not a retirement yet it's considered a retirement and comes with full compensation – when you work for local government in the State of New Jersey.
Interesting questions, Wu-Su, but very slanted. Don't know the answers. Maybe if you could have better stood the heat, you'd still be in the kitchen where decisions are made. But the heat sometimes burns, doesn't it?
#17
Posted 02 July 2010 - 10:36 PM
Thoughtful, on Jun 29 2010, 04:47 PM, said:
Why slanted; the questions are valid and you avoid attempting to answer them. Your rather contrived effort to divert attention from the questions using rather trite allustions to heat, kitchen and burns, was rather gallant, yet ineffective. Do you have answeres to the questions, if not, then admit it or avoid the need to make unsubstantiated comments.
#18 *Thoughtful II*
Posted 03 July 2010 - 06:29 PM
wu-su, on Jul 2 2010, 10:36 PM, said:
You ask why slanted? You're kidding, right? You use "dirty work" and "cover the Finance Chair's back" and "chosen vendors"! You're biased and have an agenda.
By the way, that kitchen reference was dead-on. Sounds like you've been burned!

Help
Start New Topic
Add Reply

MultiQuote








